TITLE

No-consent study raises concern over patient rights

PUB. DATE
August 2007
SOURCE
Healthcare Risk Management;Aug2007, Vol. 29 Issue 8, p85
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. A study that will allow different treatment methods to be tested on patients without first informing them and obtaining their consent is raising questions among risk managers. Some question the ethics of such research, while advocates say there is no other way to gain valuable clinical insight. • Although individual patients do not consent to the treatment, local investigational review boards must sign off on the study. • The research involves emergent situations in which it is difficult to obtain consent from the patient or family. • The study is limited, but some critics say the work can undermine the concept of informed consent. INSET: Studies will assess methods in emergencies.
ACCESSION #
25967358

 

Related Articles

  • What's on your mind?  // Applied Clinical Trials;Jul2002, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p18 

    Explores the principle of informed consent to participate in clinical trials. Legal meanings and implications; Administration of study drugs; Evaluation of email as a safe means of information transfer in clinical trials.

  • Pediatric Informed Consent. Simar, M. Renee; Johnson, Virginia A. // Applied Clinical Trials;Jul2002, Vol. 11 Issue 7, p46 

    Compares adult and pediatric informed consent to clinical trials. Principles of pediatric consent; Algorithms for pediatric assent and parental permission; Sample guidance documents that refer to pediatric research.

  • Three Ways to Improve the Consent Process. McDaniel, Darren; Baker, Matt; McDaniel, Todd // Applied Clinical Trials;Oct2002, Vol. 11 Issue 10, p60 

    Offers suggestions to improve consent in clinical trials. Writing of a consent form; Institutional review boards' observation of the consent process; Acknowledgement of subjects' responsibility.

  • Multimedia Delivery Can Enhance the Consent Process. Brady, Jeffrey S. // Applied Clinical Trials;Jan2003, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p36 

    Focuses on the development of patient consent practices in multimedia delivery in the U.S. Lawsuits filed against medical research facilities for the death of human used for research; Importance of providing research participants with clinical trial protocols; Factors affecting the ability of...

  • The Patient Recruitment Market.  // Applied Clinical Trials;Nov2003 Supplement, Vol. 12, p14 

    Focuses on the patient recruitment market in clinical trials in the United States. Professional recruitment and retention; Market research.

  • Site Coordinators: An Untapped Resource.  // Applied Clinical Trials;Jan2011, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p18 

    The article focuses on the importance of site coordinators in improving the success of clinical trials such as completion of informed consent forms, entered data, and negotiated site contracts.

  • The MRC and informed consent. Glover, Jonathan // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);7/19/1986, Vol. 293 Issue 6540, p157 

    Focuses on the informed consent in clinical trials. Importance of informed consent from patients; Exceptions of gravely ill patient from informed consent; Requirements for consent.

  • Paradoxical Subjects. Ganter, Jane // Applied Clinical Trials;Sep2001, Vol. 10 Issue 9, p12 

    Focuses on the positive response of clinical trial subjects in the United States. Willingness of subjects to take the risk associated with the trial; Accounts on the negative stories about clinical research; Importance of a careful informed consent process in clinical trials.

  • What's on your mind? Crawley, Francis P.; Khin-Muang-Gyi, Felix; Goebel Jr., Paul W.; Whalen, Matthew D.; Smith, Brenda; Ranganathan, Kay; Hochhauser, Mark; Urbin, Kathy; Becker, Robert // Applied Clinical Trials;Jun2002, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p16 

    Presents letters to editor on the highlighted suggestion for informed consent in clinical research. Replacement of the term 'informed consent' with 'informed decision making'; Concerns on the application of the term; Basis of the patient-physician relationship.

  • Disclosing the “Inclusion Benefit”. Silverman, William A // Journal of Perinatology;Jun2002, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p261 

    Journal of Perinatology (2002) 22, 261–262 DOI: 10.1038/sj/jp/7210700

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics