Effects of Short- and Long-Term Changes in Auditory Feedback on Vowel and Sibilant Contrasts

Lane, Harlan; Matthies, Melanie L.; Guenther, Frank H.; Denny, Margaret; Perkell, Joseph S.; Stockmann, Ellen; Tiede, Mark; Vick, Jennell; Zandipour, Majid
August 2007
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Aug2007, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p913
Academic Journal
Purpose: To assess the effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts and to evaluate hypotheses arising from a model of speech motor planning. Method: The perception and production of vowel and sibilant contrasts were measured in 8 postlingually deafened adults prior to activation of their cochlear implant speech processors, 1 month postactivation, and 1 year postactivation. Measures were taken postactivation both with and without auditory feedback. Contrast measures were also made for a group of speakers with reportedly normal hearing speaking with masked and unmasked auditory feedback. Results: Vowel and sibilant contrasts, measured in the absence of auditory feedback after 1 month of prosthesis use, were diminished compared with their values measured before prosthesis. Contrasts measured in the absence of auditory feedback after 1 year's experience with the prosthesis were increased compared with their values after 1 month's experience. In both time samples, contrasts were enhanced when auditory feedback was restored. Conclusion: The provision of prosthetic hearing to postlingually deafened adults impaired their phonemic contrasts at first, as their auditory feedback had novel characteristics. Once auditory feedback became recalibrated with prosthesis use, it could, in turn, revise feedforward commands that control the contrasts in its absence.


Related Articles

  • Hearing Performance in Noise of Chochlear Implant Patients versus Severely-Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Patients with Hearing Aids. Hamzavi, Jafar; Franz, Peter; Baumgartner, Wolf Dieter; Gstoettner, Wolfgang // Audiology: Journal of Auditory Communication;Jan/Feb2001, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p26 

    It is possible for most post-lingually deaf patients to attain significant open speech recognition following cochlear implantation. In contrast, many severely-profoundly sensorineural hearing-impaired patients receive no benefit from their hearing aids, especially in situations with background...

  • Effects of Talker Variability on Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implants. Yi-ping Chang; Qian-Jie Fu // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Dec2006, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p1331 

    Purpose: To investigate the effects of talker variability on vowel recognition by cochlear implant (CI) users and by normal-hearing (NH) participants listening to 4-channel acoustic CI simulations. Method: CI users were tested with their clinically assigned speech processors. For NH...

  • Guest Editorial: Cochlear implants and hearing aids: Some personal and professional reflections. Ross, Mark // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2008, Vol. 45 Issue 5, preceding p651 

    The author mentions his personal experience of being diagnosed with a progressive hearing disorder that would eventually result in deafness and the hearing devices that he has used. Topics include the aural rehabilitation program at Walter Reed Army Medical Center for military personnel, a...

  • Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. Fu, Qian-Jie; Nogaki, Geraldine // JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology;Mar2005, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p19 

    The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the...

  • On the Structure of Phoneme Categories in Listeners With Cochlear Implants. Lane, Harlan; Denny, Margaret; Guenther, Frank H.; Hanson, Helen M.; Marrone, Nicole; Matthies, Melanie L.; Perkell, Joseph S.; Stockmann, Ellen; Tiede, Mark; Vick, Jennell; Zandipour, Majid // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Feb2007, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p2 

    Purpose: To describe cochlear implant users' phoneme labeling, discrimination, and prototypes for a vowel and a sibilant contrast, and to assess the effects of 1 year's experience with prosthetic hearing. Method: Based on naturally produced clear examples of "boot," "beet," "said," and "shed" by...

  • The relationship between the speech perception and the degree of satisfaction among adult users of cochlear implants. Soares Granço, Fernanda; Freitas Fernandes, Nayara; Morettin, Marina; Costa Filho, Orozimbo Alves; Bevilacqua, Maria Cecília // International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology;Apr-Jun2013, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p202 

    Introduction: In recent years, the benefits associated with the use of cochlear implants (CIs), especially with regard to speech perception, have proven to surpass those produced by the use of hearing aids, making CIs a highly efficient resource for patients with severe/profound hearing loss....

  • Counseling Adults Prior to a Cochlear Implant.  // ASHA Leader;9/26/2006, Vol. 11 Issue 13, p5 

    The article discusses the use of cochlear implantation for people who suffer from profound hearing impairment. Many adults that have prelinguistic hearing loss could benefit from comprehensive counselling before they receive their implants. They should discuss their options with a...

  • Vowel production by hearing-impaired children. Diefendorf, Erin M.; Kirk, Karen I. // Hearing Instruments;May96, p26 

    Examines speech production skills of children who use a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant (CI). Changes over time in the production of vowel features; Comparison with the vowel production skills of age-matched children who used conventional hearing aids.

  • Hearing Rehabilitation in a Patient with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the Only Hearing Ear. Hawkins, David B. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Mar2008, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p267 

    A case report is presented of a 62-year-old software product manager who had normal hearing in one ear and a congenital profound hearing loss in the other ear and then sustained a sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the only hearing ear. The approach to amplification decisions, cochlear implant...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics