Pfizer to appeal trademark verdict

October 1999
Business Insurance;10/18/99, Vol. 33 Issue 42, p64
Discloses the plans of Pfizer Inc. to contest a jury award of $147 million in damages stemming from a trademark infringement dispute.


Related Articles

  • Restrained temporarily.  // Pharmaceutical Executive;May98, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p128 

    Reports on a temporary restraining order granted to Pfizer against a company marketing a copy-cat version of Viagra, an impotence medication for men. Companies charged by Pfizer with attempting to capitalize on the popularity of Viagra.

  • Fake evidence: court decision against Pfizer overturned.  // Medical Marketing & Media;Jul2000, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p18 

    Reports that United States Judge Lourdes Baird has thrown out a $143 million trademark infringement against Pfizer Inc. for using Trovan as the name of the antibiotic trovafloxacin. Complaints' use of counterfeit consumer complaint letters; Misrepresentation of a consultant's report on Pfizer's...

  • Life goes on at Levin & Hawes after Pfizer win. Cruz, Sherri // Orange County Business Journal;02/21/2000, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p18 

    Reports that the Laguna Beach, California-based intellectual property law firm of Levin & Hawes has won a $143 million trademark-infringement verdict against healthcare giant Pfizer Inc. Great Britain-based Trovan Ltd.'s opposition to Pfizer's use of the name Trovan for its antibiotic; Firm's...

  • ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS--TRADEMARK.  // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Annual Review 2003, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p275 

    Reports on the decision of U.S courts on cases involving trademark infringements. Trademark protection of abbreviation under an infringement or dilution theory; Bad faith registration; Lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

  • Court limits legal reach of Internet. Greenwald, Judy // Business Insurance;09/22/97, Vol. 31 Issue 38, p3 

    Cites the ruling by the 2nd United States Circuit Court of Appeals in New York in trademark infringement case, which stated that a business cannot be sued in a state just because it has a World Wide Web site that is accessible to residents. Reference to the case `Bensusan Restaurant Corp. vs....

  • Levi Strauss 3--Tesco 0. Chahil, Ravinder // Brand Strategy;Sep2002, Issue 163, p33 

    Reports on the trade mark infringement lawsuit filed by jeans manufacturer Levi Strauss against Great Britain-based retailer Tesco's Stores Ltd. as of September 2002. Case background; British High Court's ruling in favor of Levi Strauss; Tesco's Stores' parallel trading of Levi's jeans;...

  • Applicability of the principle of unitary character in trade mark infringement proceedings.  // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Dec2015, Vol. 10 Issue 12, p953 

    The article focuses on the applicability of the principle related to unitary character in trade mark infringement proceedings in Germany.

  • CORPORATE.  // MondayMorning;6/23/2014, Vol. 22 Issue 23, p2 

    The article offers news briefs related to medical supplies industry. Kindred Healthcare Inc. has raised its takeover bid for Gentiva Health Services Inc. to about 534 million dollars. WebMD Health Corp. said it is suing Everyday Health Inc. for trademark infringement, false advertising and...

  • E.U. probing U.K. regulation of Lloyd's. Aldred, Carolyn // Business Insurance;10/14/2002, Vol. 36 Issue 41, p25 

    Reports the regulation of Lloyd's of London in accordance with European Union insurance directives regarding auditing and solvency in Europe. Inauguration of formal infringement proceedings; Incurrence of the significant losses.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics