Playboy gets day in Supreme Court

December 1999
Multichannel News;12/06/99, Vol. 20 Issue 50, p24
Reports that the United States Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in Playboy Entertainment Group Inc.'s challenge to a 1996 law mandating the scrambling of adult sex channels. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's views on the issue; Law governing adult channels in the country.


Related Articles

  • Playboy finds an Internet precedent to hop after. McCullagh, Declan // Time;3/16/1998, Vol. 151 Issue 10, p20 

    Discusses the lawsuit filed by the The Playboy Channel against the United States government. The argument of Playboy that a US Supreme Court ruling that made the Internet safe for pornography, applies the same to cable television; The question as to whether the Playboy Channel's programming is...

  • He's watching what?! Cannon, Angie // U.S. News & World Report;06/05/2000, Vol. 128 Issue 22, p36 

    Focuses on a United States Supreme Court decision to strike down a federal law requiring cable systems to restrict sexually explicit content to late-night hours. Ruling that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 violates the free speech rights of Playboy Entertainment Group Inc.; Prediction by...

  • Playboy Advocate Fights for Speech, Not Porn.  // Multichannel News;06/05/2000, Vol. 21 Issue 23, p45 

    Expounds on the motives of free speech lawyer Robert Corn-Revere's advocacy for the overturning of the law that prevents kids from viewing pornographic material on television in the United States. Law's violation of Playboy Entertainment Group Inc.'s free speech rights; Analysis of scope of...

  • 505 Decision Won't Help Adult-Analog PPV.  // Multichannel News;06/05/2000, Vol. 21 Issue 23, p38 

    Comments on the implications of the United States Supreme Court's decision to strike down Section 505 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on the adult pay-per-view television industry. Enabling of operators to offer around-the-clock erotica; Operators' plan of offering full-time adult...

  • Cable-access smut gets airing in Supreme Court. Boliek, Brooks // Hollywood Reporter; 

    Reports on a case before the US Supreme Court involving the constitutionality of the 1992 Cable Law aimed at restricting smut on cable channels. Provision of authority to cable operators to reject obscene programming; Independent groups' claim that the law violates the First Amendment.

  • Cable porn wins 1 out of 2 at Supreme Court. Flint, Joe // Variety;07/01/96, Vol. 363 Issue 9, p5 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's ruling on the showing of pornographic materials on cable television. Comments from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Reed Hundt on the court decision.

  • Court rebuffs adult nets. Burgi, Michael // MediaWeek;03/31/97, Vol. 7 Issue 13, p10 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's rejection of a request by Playboy Television and Spice Entertainment, producers and distributors of adult, sexually oriented cable programming, to ban Section 505 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Law's provision which limits the showing of sex programs;...

  • Adult channels lose in court. Hatch, David // Electronic Media;03/31/97, Vol. 16 Issue 14, p8 

    Focuses on Playboy Enterprises' vow to press its legal battle against restrictions requiring the full scrambling of sexually oriented cable channels, despite a setback in the US Supreme Court. Background on the high court's rejection of efforts by Playboy and Spice Entertainment Cos. to block...

  • FCC'S EXPLICIT RULING. McClintock, Pamela // Daily Variety;11/6/2001, Vol. 273 Issue 59, p3 

    Focuses on the action of United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) related to scrambling of sexually explicit programming in cables. Call of FCC commissioner Michael Copps in alternatives in protecting the children from pornography; Agreement between federal court and Playboy...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics