The Paths of the Law: Historical Consciousness, Creative Democracy, and Judicial Review

Kidwell, Erin Rahne
September 1998
Albany Law Review;1998, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p91
Academic Journal
Examines the jurisprudence of Oliver Wendell Holmes, a former justice of the United States. Views of Holmes on legal pragmaticism; Overview on the importance of historical consciousness in Holmes' legal thought; Details on the Emersonian roots of American legal pragmaticism.


Related Articles

  • Pragmatism, Holism, and the Concept of Law. Dyrda, Adam MichaƂ // Erasmus Law Review;Aug2015, p2 

    When discussing O. W. Holmes's answer to the question What constitutes the law? Morton White underlines the fact that Holmes's inquiry didn't focus on developing the concept of law. White states: '...Holmes said little in The Path of the Law about the notion of legal authority, perhaps because...

  • Holmes, Pragmatism, and the Deconstruction of Utilitarianism. Kellogg, Frederic R. // Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society;Winter1987, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p99 

    Explores the associations of thinker Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. with pragmatism and utilitarianism. Traditional interpretations which have associated Holmes with legal positivism; Overview of Holmes' view of the relationship of law and morals; Sources of misunderstanding of Holmes.

  • Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck v. Bell. Haack, Susan; Calcaterra, Rosa M.; Frega, Roberto; Maddalena, Giovanni // European Journal of Pragmatism & American Philosophy;2011, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p65 

    Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. -- a founding member of the Metaphysical Club, and traditionally regarded as the first legal pragmatist -- would eventually become a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. In one of his best-known rulings for the Court, Buck v. Bell (1927), Holmes held that Carrie Buck's...

  • FREEDOM OF THOUGHT FOR THE EXTENDED MIND: COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION. Blitz, Marc Jonathan // Wisconsin Law Review;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 4, p1049 

    Freedom of thought is often described as the central liberty in our constitutional system. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said that there is no principle that "more imperatively calls for attachment" than "the principle of free thought." The Supreme Court has likewise often placed it at the...

  • The Problem of Justice Holmes. Hartnett, Robert C. // America;6/16/1951, Vol. 85 Issue 11, p283 

    The article focuses on Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. who subsequently teach in Harvard Law School. It states that Holmes' jurisprudence became the center of controversy when his critics were challenging it. Holmes was on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1902 to 1932 and died in 1935 two days...

  • Holmes' failure. Weinberg, Louise // Michigan Law Review;Dec97, Vol. 96 Issue 3, p691 

    Focuses on Oliver Wendell Holmes's book entitled `The Path of the Law.' Commentary on the type of language used in Holmes's work; Description of Holmes's literary techniques; Reference to his book `The Common Law'; Review of Holmes's work; Discussion on the issue of legal realism and legal...

  • Hobbes, Holmes, and Dewey: Pragmatism and the Problem of Order. Kellogg, Frederic R. // Contemporary Pragmatism;2010, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p1 

    Civil wars in England and America were catalysts in forming the jurisprudential views of Thomas Hobbes and Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Holmes's pragmatism advances a fundamentally distinct view of order from Hobbes's analytical theory. Holmes replaced the Hobbesian analytical model of law with an...

  • THE PATENT MALPRACTICE THICKET, OR WHY JUSTICE HOLMES WAS RIGHT. Janiche, Paul M. // Houston Law Review;Symposium 2012, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p437 

    When a state has created a cause of action for legal malpractice, does the presence of an embedded issue of federal law in such a case mean that any such action arises under federal law? If the answer is yes and the federal law is preemptive--as patent law is--that would mean only federal courts...

  • THE DARK SIDE OF THE FORCE: THE LEGACY OF JUSTICE HOLMES FOR FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE. Heyman, Steven J. // William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal;Mar2011, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p661 

    The author discusses the paradox of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He mentions that the freedom of speech promote fundamental values, however, undermine these values through attacking the dignity and personality of others. He argues that the free speech tradition consists of the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics