Flake challenges Murtha on earmarks

Bogardus, Kevin
June 2007
Hill;6/29/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 80, p6
The article reports on the proposed budget cut for earmarks by Representative Jeff Flake to minimize government expenditures in the U.S. Flake had offered 12 amendments to House appropriations bills to cut 12 earmarks that was intended for Pennsylvania. On other hand, Representative John Murtha's office had declined to comment on the issue.


Related Articles

  • The Secretly Relieved Caucus. Schlesinger, Robert // U.S. News Digital Weekly;6/14/2013, Vol. 5 Issue 24, p20 

    The article centers on Arizona Republican Senator Jeff Flake's remarks at a press event on the U.S. Congress members being secretly relieved at being spared the spending and cutting decisions.

  • Congressman supports curb of federal land-grab. Woodburn, David // Inside Tucson Business;12/6/2004, Vol. 14 Issue 25, p3 

    Focuses on the views of Arizona Congressman Jeff Flake on federal land acquisitions. Passage of an omnibus spending bill by Congress to improve compensation to counties for federal land acquisitions while cutting the federal spending on such acquisitions; Complexity of the formula in the Payment...

  • Murtha: DoD Funding To Likely To Come From Continuing Resolution Next Month. DiMascio, Jen // Defense Daily;9/18/2007, Vol. 235 Issue 55, p1 

    This article states that a continuing resolution will likely fund U.S. Defense Department operations through the middle of November 2007, Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) told reports on September 17. The Senate predicts it can pass its version of the bill by October 6, which would allow for a...

  • Murtha Drops Support For Added VIP Jets. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;8/12/2009, Vol. 243 Issue 30, p1 

    The article reports that Democratic Representative from Pennsylvania John P. Murtha said on August 10, 2009 that he will support removing funding for passenger jets not sought by the Pentagon from the fiscal year 2010 defense appropriations bill. The appropriations legislation, Murtha's House...

  • Pace of Defense Approps Bill Slows. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;10/15/2009, Vol. 244 Issue 10, p1 

    The article reports that the pace of the U.S. Department of Defense spending bill for the current fiscal year has slowed on Capitol Hill, where a previously planned meeting between two major negotiators was delayed. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye said on October 14, 2009...

  • Department of Energy disputes Rep. Murtha's claims on earmark request. Crabtree, Susan // Hill;7/19/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 88, p3 

    The article reports that U.S. Dept. of Energy (DoE) has kept on denying Representative John Murtha's claim that it supports his $1 million earmark request to establish the Center for Instrumental Critical Infrastructure in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. DoE spokeswoman Anne Kolton has emphasized that...

  • HAC-D Deletes FY '09 DDG-1000 Ship, But Doesn't Fully Back New Destroyer Plan. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;7/31/2008, Vol. 239 Issue 22, p1 

    The article focuses on the issues in the fiscal year 2009 defense bill of the U.S. House Appropriations defense subcommittee (HAC-D). HAC-D Chairman John P. Murtha and House Appropriations Committee (HAC) Chairman David Obey said it is not clear the bill will make it through Congress before the...

  • Defense Appropriations Bill Chances Improve In Senate, Though Action Stalled In House. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;7/16/2008, Vol. 239 Issue 11, p8 

    The article reports on the fate of a U.S. Defense Appropriations bill. According to U.S. Senate leaders the bill is expected to clear their chamber in 2008 but the fate of the legislation in the U.S. House has been postponed. It mentions that the U.S. House Appropriations defense subcommittee...

  • GWOT Supplemental Will Not Have F-22 Funds. Rutherford, Emelie // Defense Daily;5/7/2008, Vol. 238 Issue 27, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. House is expected to take up a $183.69 billion multiyear war-supplemental funding bill that would not include any added money for the Air Force's F-22 jets. As House leaders have finalized the legislation, they did not include $500 million in F-22 long-lead...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics