EPA splits difference on ozone clean air standard

Snyder, Jim
June 2007
Hill;6/22/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 76, p10
The article reports on the proposal made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to toughen ozone clearn-air rules in the U.S. The proposed standards seek to reduce ozone levels from 84 parts per billion to between 70 and 75 parts per billion. However, Bryan Brendle of the National Association of Manufacturers said that while EPA did not accept the science panel's recommendations, the proposed rule would still have a detrimental impact on manufacturing employment.


Related Articles

  • Air Pollution: Delays in Motor Vehicle Inspection Programs Jeopardize Attainment of the Ozone Standard: RCED-98-175.  // GAO Reports;6/15/1998, p1 

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 requires states with the most serious ozone and carbon monoxide problems--23 states were identified--to implement enhanced inspection and maintenance programs to reduce motor vehicle emissions. These states were required to have their programs up and running...

  • Economics of Preserving The Ozone Layer.  // Futurist;Jan/Feb89, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p40 

    Focuses on the economic impact on American businesses of a national phase-out of widely used ozone-depleting chemicals. Statistics that estimate the environmental benefits of new environmental laws and regulations imposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Discussion of...

  • STRONGER SMOG STANDARD?  // Electric Perspectives;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p8 

    The article deals with the proposal of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to impose a stronger air quality health standard for ground-level ozone. The proposal would revise the standard set in 1997. The sources of ground-level ozone include emissions from industrial facilities,...

  • EPA Ozone Proposal Faces Criticism. Sawyer, Tom // ENR: Engineering News-Record;7/2/2007, Vol. 258/259 Issue 24/1, p9 

    The article reports on the criticism of the proposal of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to tighten the ground-level ozone for the first time since 1997. Industry groups complain that the existing ozone benchmark has not yet been fully implemented, and from environmentalists, who...

  • State waiting for courts to sort through new air-quality rules. Lane, Amy // Crain's Detroit Business;03/26/2001, Vol. 17 Issue 13, p19 

    Reports on the dilemma faced by Michigan in implementing federal air standards for ozone and soot. Counties that are out of compliance according to an initial analysis conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Variables that make it difficult to assess the standards'...

  • In response to the PM debate. Wolff, George T. // Regulation;Winter97, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p9 

    Comments on the US Environmental Protection Agency Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee's 1997 review of the scientific basis for new fine particulate matter (PM) standards. Doubts about the causality issue; Temporal correlation exhibited by air pollutants; Longitudinal correlation between...

  • EPA says costs outweigh benefits of new rules, but wants them anyway. Catanzaro, Michael // Human Events;06/20/97, Vol. 53 Issue 23, p4 

    Reports on US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Carol Browner's adherence to the standards devised by the EPA on two major classes of air pollutants despite high cost. Environmental analysts' estimate on the cost of the regulations; Criticisms against the environmental...

  • EPA Slack on Upholding Rules For Clean Air.  // National Parks;Jan/Feb85, Vol. 59 Issue 1/2, p7 

    Reports on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) review and revision of the clean air regulations. Factors threatening the standards for maintaining clean air; Administration's lack of interest in protecting citizens and resources from air pollution and acid rain; Issues to be...

  • California Legislature Acts To Void EPA's Regulation.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;9/22/2003, Vol. 251 Issue 12, p9 

    Focuses on legislation passed by state Assembly of California against air pollution regulations issued by the U.S.-based Environmental Protection Agency. Reason for protest by several states of the U.S. against air pollution regulations.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics