Assessing Attitudes Toward Laxative Preparation in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Effects on Future Testing: Potential Receptivity to Computed Tomographic Colonography

Beebe, Timothy J.; Johnson, C. Daniel; Stoner, Sarah M.; Anderson, Kari J.; Limburg, Paul J.
June 2007
Mayo Clinic Proceedings;Jun2007, Vol. 82 Issue 6, p666
Academic Journal
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether removal of the laxative preparation would improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. RESPONDENTS AND METHODS: Data are from a mixed-mode mail and telephone survey of 1636 noninstitutionalized Minnesota residents who were 18 years or older that was conducted from July 15 through October 25, 2005. The overall response rate was 49%. Analysis focused on the 759 respondents who were 50 years or older. RESULTS: One third (32%) of the respondents identified the laxative preparation as the most troublesome part of CRC screening. Overall, the self-reported likelihood and anticipated timing of examination increase when the laxative preparation is removed. Both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the odds of being ‘much more likely’ to undergo screening in the future with a test that does not include a laxative preparation are greatest among those who have been tested previously, regard the laxative preparation as a big problem, or both. CONCLUSION: In this prospective survey, laxative preparation appeared to be a major disincentive to CRC screening. Emerging data suggest that performance of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography may represent an attractive option that removes this relatively common disincentive to CRC screening participation.


Related Articles

  • Attitudes Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests. Ling, Bruce S.; Moskowitz, Mark A.; Wachs, David; Pearson, Brad; Schroy, Paul C. // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Dec2001, Vol. 16 Issue 12, p822 

    OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and physician preferences in regard to 5 colorectal cancer screening alternatives endorsed by a 1997 expert panel, determine the impact of patient and physician values regarding certain test features on screening preference, and assess physicians' perceptions of...

  • Effect of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy-Based Screening on Incidence and Mortality of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Elmunzer, B. Joseph; Hayward, Rodney A.; Schoenfeld, Philip S.; Saini, Sameer D.; Deshpande, Amar; Waljee, Akbar K. // PLoS Clinical Trials;Dec2012, Vol. 7 Issue 12, p1 

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials conducted by B. Joseph Elmunzer and colleagues reports that that flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer in average-risk patients, as compared to usual care or no screening.

  • Closely Screen Relatives of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Patients.  // Modern Medicine;Oct98, Vol. 66 Issue 10, p12 

    Discusses the abstract of the article `Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with `sporadic' colorectal cancer: A case control study,' by A. Pariente, C. Milan et al, published in the July 1998 issue of the `Gastroenterology' periodical.

  • A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy Harewood, Gavin C.; Wiersema, Maurits J.; Melton III, L. Joseph // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec2002, Vol. 97 Issue 12, p3186 

    OBJECTIVES:Medicare beneficiaries now have access to screening colonoscopy (SC). For colon cancer screening to be fruitful, SC must become more acceptable to a broad segment of this population. However, we currently lack knowledge of which aspects of SC have an impact on patient acceptance. The...

  • Back Door Blues. Thornton, Jim // GQ: Gentlemen's Quarterly;Apr2003, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p112 

    Presents the author's experiences with colonoscopy. Participation in a National Cancer Institute trial to undergo three successive colonoscopies at the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center; Use of colonoscopies to detect colon cancer; Annual number of colon and rectal cancer cases in...

  • The importance of getting a screening colonoscopy. Tariq, Syed // St. Charles Journal;7/18/2012, Vol. 47 Issue 29, pA7 

    The author explains why a colonoscopy is necessary for diagnosing any cancerous growth in the colon.

  • Risk factors for colorectal neoplasms based on colonoscopy and pathological diagnoses of Chinese citizens: a multicenter, case-control study. Qin, Miao; Ma, Lan-Qing; Tan, Juan; Chen, Ya-Rong; Zhu, Liang-Ru; Lin, Rong; Hu, Wei-Ling; Li, Jing-Nan; Zhang, Kun-He; Wang, Yan; Li, Jian-Sheng; Xiao, Bing; Chen, Hao-Yan; Chen, Ying-Xuan; Fang, Jing-Yuan // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Mar2015, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p353 

    Purpose: Since observational data in the urban residents are required to better assess the risk factors of colorectal neoplasm occurrence and the effectiveness of colonoscopy screening and surveillance, we conducted a case-control study at multicenters in China to identify patient...

  • EARLY-ONSET COLORECTAL CANCER: CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS (EOCRC). Comandasu, Meda Laura; Suliman, Emel; Rusu, Octavia; Savlovschi, C.; Oprescu, S. // Romanian Medical Journal;2015, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p189 

    Objective. The purpose of this study is to analyse histopathological and clinical characteristics of EOCRC. Colorectal cancer was formerly considered as a disease of senescent age; in the last years, it is a noticeable trend of growing incidence among young people (aged between 20 and 45 years)....

  • Too Many US Adults Still Pass Up Colorectal Cancer Screening.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;1/1/2014, Vol. 311 Issue 1, p20 

    The article focuses on a U.S. telephone survey which found that some adults have failed to undergo current screening methods for colorectal cancer.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics