TITLE

The size of cartel overcharges: Implications for U.S. and EU fining policies

AUTHOR(S)
Connor, John M.; Lande, Robert H.
PUB. DATE
December 2006
SOURCE
Antitrust Bulletin;Winter2006, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p983
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the cartel fines and its significance to U.S. and the European Union (EU). The cartel overcharge is larger than the criminal fines of EU and the U.S. which means that U.S. and EU should increase their penalties for hard-core collusion. Monetary fines are the only punishment imposed by EU to the convicted corporate cartel participants. In the U.S. the maximum fine is 80% of the sales in the cartelized market during the entire conspiracy period.
ACCESSION #
25532571

 

Related Articles

  • FINE SCHEDULE WITH HETEROGENOUS CARTELS: ARE THE WRONG CARTELS DETERRED? Jensen, Sissel; Sørgard, Lars // Journal of Competition Law & Economics;Jun2016, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p263 

    This article analyzes the minimum fines necessary to prevent price fixing when the size of the potential cartel overcharge differs across industries. We show that the incentive constraint is typically binding in industries where cartels would lead to a high overcharge, while the participation...

  • Cartels and Antitrust: The Role of Fines in Deterring Violations at the Margin. Smith, W. James; Vaughan, Michael B.; Formby, John P. // Southern Economic Journal;Apr87, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p985 

    Investigates the role of fines and damages in deterring antitrust violations. Interaction of fine structure and litigation strategy under profit-based damages; Interaction of fine structure and litigation strategy under damages based on monopolistic overcharge; Implication of allowing fines to...

  • COMPETENCIA.  // Actualidad Juridica (1578-956X);2011, Issue 29, p178 

    No abstract available.

  • Analysis of Current Penalty Schemes for Violations of Antitrust Laws. Motchenkova, E.; Kort, P. M. // Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications;Feb2006, Vol. 128 Issue 2, p431 

    The main feature of the penalty schemes described in current sentencing guidelines is that the fine is based on the accumulated gains from cartel activities or price-fixing activities for the firm. The regulations suggest modeling the penalty as an increasing function of the accumulated illegal...

  • EU Sanctions for Cartels on the Rise. Urlus, Hans // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q3, p1 

    The article reports on the new guidelines for setting fines for infringements of competition law, which were announced by the European Commission on June 28, 2006. The implications of the guidelines for cartels are addressed. Moreover, the application of the policy to cases of abuse of dominance...

  • Paula Rebstock. Jayne, Vicki // New Zealand Management;Jul2006, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p40 

    The article presents an interview with Paula Rebstock, chair of the New Zealand Commerce Commission. Regarding the penalties imposed by the commission from companies that breached the required behavior standards of competition law, Rebstock said that the biggest fine was $100,000 and then...

  • Risky business. Metaxas, George // ICIS Chemical Business;4/9/2007, Vol. 2 Issue 61, p24 

    The article reports on the increasing fines imposed by the European Commission (EC) against cartels. The total amount of fines against cartels between 2004 and 2006 came close to £3 billion and affected almost 120 companies. About two-thirds of the total amount of fines was directed against...

  • CARTEL PUNISHMENTAND THE DISTORTIVE EFFECTS OF FINES. Dargaud, Emilie; Mantovani, Andrea; Reggiani, Carlo // Journal of Competition Law & Economics;Jun2016, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p375 

    The fight against cartels is a priority for antitrust authorities worldwide but the goal is pursued in many different ways. Several types of fines can be levied on firms that are caught colluding but one common trait is that fines are usually distortive. In this article we focus on the economic...

  • European Union levies substantial fines on members of synthetic rubber cartel.  // International Law Update;Dec2006, Vol. 12, p240 

    The article reports on the imposition of substantial fines by the European Union on members of the synthetic rubber cartel. The Union fined four rubber companies for fixing the price of the synthetic rubber. The commission also granted immunity to Bayer AG for acting as the whistle blower on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics