TITLE

How to be completely wrong

AUTHOR(S)
Gibbs, Mark
PUB. DATE
November 1999
SOURCE
Network World;11/15/99, Vol. 16 Issue 46, p154
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Criticizes the verdict of a federal judge in the United States which declared Microsoft Corp. as a monopoly. Parallelism between the experiences of Standard Oil Company and Microsoft; Arguments against the notion that Microsoft has become a monopoly; Microsoft's adherence to the rules of the free market.
ACCESSION #
2552831

 

Related Articles

  • Standard Oil and Microsoft—intriguing parallels or limping analogies? Flynn, John J. // Antitrust Bulletin;Winter2001, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p645 

    Examines the monopolization charges of Standard Oil Co. and Microsoft Corp. in the United States. Brief overview on the Standard Oil case; Proceedings on the Microsoft case; Methods used by the companies in gaining dominance in the industry.

  • Leave Microsoft Alone. Titus, Jon // Test & Measurement World;Jun2000, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p7 

    Comments on the United States Department of Justice's consideration of the fate of Microsoft Corp. Outcome of broken up monopolies such as Standard Oil Trust and the International Business Machines Corp.; Competition between operating systems Microsoft Windows and Linux; Self-regulatory...

  • Microsoft and Standard Oil: Radical lessons for antitrust reform. Boudreaux, Donald J.; Folsom, Burton W. // Antitrust Bulletin;Fall99, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p555 

    Argues that Microsoft Corp. does not possess monopoly power in the United States. Behavior of Microsoft as the best evidence; Review of the history of Standard Oil Company; Features of the modern market economy; Facts that counsel caution against using antitrust; Importance of entrepreneurial...

  • REMEDIES FOR MONOPOLIZATION FROM STANDARD OIL TO MICROSOFT AND INTEL: THE CHANGING NATURE OF MONOPOLY LAW FROM ELIMINATION OF MARKET POWER TO REGULATION OF ITS USE. CARSTENSEN, PETER C. // Southern California Law Review;2012, Vol. 85 Issue 3, p815 

    The article discusses potential remedies for monopolization in the U.S. as of March 2012, focusing on market power, an analysis of American monopoly law, and several legal cases including the U.S. Supreme Court matter Standard Oil Co. v. United States. Litigation involving the computer companies...

  • Oil Monopoly in Germany.  // America;11/30/1912, Vol. 8 Issue 8, p183 

    The article focuses on the conflict concerning the Standard Oil interests. It is noted that European nations sustained efforts in restraining the American Trust's growth, while Germany seems to be reaching contingency. The Imperial Government made a bill wherein a monopoly in the sale of...

  • How to break up Microsoft--and local exchange monopolies. Borthick, Sandra L. // Business Communications Review;Jun98, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p8 

    Editorial. Presents ideas on how to break up Microsoft Corp. and telephone monopolies in the United States. Need for Microsoft to spin off an entity that does nothing but sell Windows 3.11, 95 and 98; Deregulation of the incumbent local exchange carriers; Separation into three separate entities.

  • Microsoft's Bust-Up Is Bad Trade Policy. Srodes, James // World Trade;Aug2000, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p16 

    Discusses the monopoly of Microsoft in the U.S. Characteristics of a monopoly; Information on the market domination of Microsoft; Actions taken by the U.S. Justice Department regarding the monopoly of Microsoft.

  • What happens if Ma Bill is split? Fitch, Malcolm // Money;May98, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p31 

    Reports on the possible benefits if Microsoft Corp. were to become a regulated monopoly. How it would benefit both the overall industry and the country; Removal of `antitrust scrutiny'; Statistics.

  • Monopoly with appeal. Charles, Ron // Christian Science Monitor;8/17/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 185, p11 

    Offers a satirical essay regarding Microsoft Corp., and the finding of the United States Supreme Court that it is a monopoly.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics