European Views of Preemption in US National Security Strategy

Guertner, Gary L.
June 2007
Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Summer2007, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p31
Academic Journal
The article presents the European views on the policies and actions supporting the preemption of U.S. national security strategy. It focuses on the transatlantic fraction over preemption and criticism on the part of the European community. It determined that before Western unity can be effective against the different threats from radical Islam, Europe and America should bridge the differences of their strategic cultures


Related Articles

  • Why aren't Americans better at strategy? Metz, Steven // Military Review;Jan/Feb97, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p187 

    Outlines the difficulties of defining a coherent national security strategy in a democracy such as the United States. Call for a coherent national security strategy; United States' dilemma related to the mismatch between commitments and the capability to attain or protect these commitments;...

  • Reframing Objectives Abroad: When To Fight, When Not. Mann, Paul // Aviation Week & Space Technology;7/31/2000, Vol. 153 Issue 5, p66 

    Reports on strategic experts' suggestion that the United States restructure national security interests so only the `vital' ones come out on top. Goal to whittle down the multiplying number of U.S. military commitments overseas; Call for a hierarchy that distinguishes 4 or five supreme national...

  • National security in the era of neuroscience. Moreno, Jonathan D. // Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics & Policy;2011, Vol. 2 Issue 1, pT:3 

    The author reflects on the relationship of neuroscience to the national security in the U.S. He mentions that there is the need for the national security to be certain on the neuroscience's intelligence and warfighting terms. Also mentioned is the are the reports related to cognitive...

  • Security chiefs seek to soothe outrage over NSA surveillance. Sasso, Brendan; Herb, Jeremy; Sink, Justin // Hill;10/30/2013, Vol. 20 Issue 124, p3 

    The article reports on an insistence by top national security officials that analysts are careful to protectprivacy and U.S. surveillance is already subject to strict oversight.

  • INSIDE LOGISTICS. Tymofichuk, Randy; Kravitsky, Stephen M.; Dawson, Michael C.; Ritschel, Tamiko L. // Air Force Journal of Logistics;Spring2006, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p46 

    The article presents a study on the impact of reducing threshold for required intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) alert rates on national security objectives in the United States. A simulation using Arena, a product of Rockwell Software, to yield the analytical information required is...

  • Frank HOFFMAN.  // Government Executive;Sep2003, Vol. 35 Issue 14, p80 

    This article presents information related to national security strategies of the U.S. in post September 11 attacks. Rather than integrate and prioritize foreign policy, economic programs and military strategy, and link them together with the agenda for securing the homeland, the U.S....

  • Editor's Shelf.  // Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Summer2001, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p125 

    Features books on United States defense strategy and security agenda from the Brookings Institution Press. Analysis of the effects of globalization on national and international security policies; Examination of arms control and missile defense; Use of military force.

  • Strategic Horizons: Egypt Shows Danger of U.S. Reliance on Local Security Partners. Metz, Steven // World Politics Review;7/10/2013, p1 

    The article comments that the turmoil in Egypt is a signal of the growing obsolescence of a fundamental precept of U.S. national security strategy of encouraging stability in key regions by relying on local security partnerships. It argues that the Egyptian crisis is an indication that the world...

  • The Department of the Domestic Response Corps. Moody, Sanders M. // Homeland Defense Journal;Nov2007, Vol. 5 Issue 11, p8 

    The article provides information concerning the need of greater federal presence in the area of homeland response capabilities in the U.S. The author infers that the presence should include a greater role for the American military. And adds that the state is not prepared to multiple simultaneous...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics