Leader Power

Barr, Judith
June 2007
Leadership Excellence;Jun2007, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p10
The author focuses on controlling leadership and power. She says that the misuse and abuse of power is sometimes under the guise of goodness. She also explains the process of healing after experiencing abusive power. She suggests to take time to write in a personal journal to release emotions from the abuse. One should find the root of the abuse and build the capacity to feel the feelings beneath it. She adds that leaders should consider the feelings of each toward his or her leadership.


Related Articles

  • The Leader's Conundrum: Exploring leadership paradox in organisation change. Lawler, John; Gold, Jeff // e-Organisations & People;Autumn2013, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p15 

    The article discusses the concept of leadership conundrum. The authors argue that there are leaders who do not understand how leadership is working in their organizations. With this, the authors suggest leaders to face a leadership conundum in their daily life. According to them, the conundrum...

  • Layoff Leadership. Noer, David // Leadership Excellence Essentials;Sep2009, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p16 

    The article discusses the traps that prevent leaders from restoring a downsized organization. Gunnysacking is defined as storing up hurt feelings, anger and unresolved conflicts. Becoming enmeshed in the cost cutting and control trap makes a leader lose sight of important objectives. Helping...

  • Control Myths: How Followers Unwittingly Keep Toxic Leaders in Power. LIPMAN-BLUMEN, JEAN // e-Organisations & People;Aug2008, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p111 

    This article presents a typology of Control Myths, unconscious mechanisms carrying the force of societal norms that operate to control followers' behaviour and guarantee devotion to toxic and non-toxic leaders alike. These Control Myths, linked to powerful human needs identified by Freud,...

  • Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. Naseer, Saima; Raja, Usman; Syed, Fauzia; Donia, Magda B.L.; Darr, Wendy // Leadership Quarterly;Feb2016, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p14 

    Using social exchange theory, we propose a three-way interaction of despotic leadership, leader member exchange (LMX), and perceived organizational politics (POP) to predict employee job performance, organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), and creativity. Using two-source field data (N =...

  • A De Gaulle Retrospective. King, Nicholas // National Review;7/25/1980, Vol. 32 Issue 15, p896 

    The article profiles French political leader Charles de Gaulle. He was not a dictator. The term does not connote the enthusiastic support and consent of his subjects. But he was a despot, a respectable despot. Press conferences were his most characteristic public appearances. The journalists...

  • Bad Leaders. Kellerman, Barbara // Leadership Excellence Essentials;Sep2007, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p17 

    The article offers tips to strengthen the capacity of leaders and to avoid turning them into bad leaders. According to the article, leaders tend to acquire bad habits when they stay in the position for too long so it is best to limit their tenure. Power must also be shared and centralized to...

  • The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders Hoyt, Crystal L.; Johnson, Stefanie K.; Murphy, Susan Elaine; Skinnell, Kerri Hogue // Leadership Quarterly;Oct2010, Vol. 21 Issue 5, p716 

    Abstract: The individual and combined impact of blatant stereotype activation and solo status or mixed-sex groups on the self-appraisals, performance, and anxiety of female leaders was examined across three laboratory studies. The first study utilized a two-condition, two-stage design in which...

  • Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. Einarsen, St�le; Aasland, Merethe Schanke; Skogstad, Anders // Leadership Quarterly;Jun2007, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p207 

    Abstract: This paper proposes a definition and a descriptive model of destructive leadership behaviour. Destructive leadership behaviour is defined as the systematic and repeated behaviour by a leader, supervisor or manager that violates the legitimate interest of the organisation by undermining...

  • Smart Leaders, Smarter Teams. Schwarz, Roger // Smart Leaders, Smarter Teams;8/9/2013, p1 

    In Smart Leaders, Smarter Teams, organizational psychologist Roger Schwarz states that poor team performance is usually the result of leaders’ mindsets. Mindsets drive behavior, which in turn drives results, and the mindsets humans have evolved with are not necessarily the best for...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics