Dems subpoena White House over attorney firings scandal

Schor, Elana
June 2007
Hill;6/14/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 71, p3
The article reports on the move of Congressional Democrats to subpoena two former presidential aides as part of the attorney firings scandal in the U.S. It is stated that both the Senate and House judiciary committees subpoenaed testimony and documents from former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former White House political affairs director Sara Taylor. Moreover, the White House was subpoenaed for documents on its involvement in the ouster of federal prosecutors.


Related Articles

  • Executive Branch Contempt of Congress. Chafetz, Josh // University of Chicago Law Review;Summer2009, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p1083 

    After former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten refused to comply with subpoenas issued by a congressional committee investigating the firing of a number of United States Attorneys, the House of Representatives voted in 2008 to hold them in contempt....

  • White House Subpoenas Authorized. Friel, Brian; Smallen, Jill; Dick, Jason // National Journal;3/24/2007, Vol. 39 Issue 12, p47 

    The article deals with the decision of both the U.S. House and Senate Judiciary committees to authorize subpoenas to compel public testimony from White House officials about the firing of eight U.S. attorneys. The committees rejected an offer by White House Counsel Fred Fielding that the...

  • Lott Sings a Happy Tune. Hurt, Charles // Washingtonian Magazine;Dec2005, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p13 

    The article focuses on U.S. Senator Trent Lott (R-Miss.). Lott expressed no interest on presidency. He plans for a return to leadership in the U.S. Senate. He mentions his doubts over U.S. Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers. He comments on the reaction of the Republicans to Miers.

  • CONGRESSIONAL INSIDERS POLL. Cohen, Richard E.; Bell, Peter // National Journal;10/22/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 43, p3235 

    Reports on the results of a Congressional Insiders Poll conducted by the "National Journal" regarding the request on the withdrawal of Harriet Miers as a U.S. Supreme Court nominee and the holder of the U.S. House speakership by January 2007 as of October 22, 2005. Number of democratic...

  • DANCING WITH HARRIET MIERS. Victor, Kirk // National Journal;10/22/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 43, p3289 

    Examines the approach to be conducted by the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on the hearings for the nomination of White House counsel Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court beginning November 7, 2005. Need for the committee to calibrate their questioning according to Sean Rushton, executive...

  • BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME. Wolffe, Richard; Klaidman, Daniel; Bailey, Holly; Darman, Jonathan; Taylor Jr., Stuart // Bulletin with Newsweek;11/8/2005, Vol. 123 Issue 6495, p50 

    This article reports that after a series of private soundings and informal head counts in the U.S. Senate, it was clear to White House counsel Harriet Miers that her chances of sitting on the Supreme Court were increasingly slim. Miers may have ended her brief and bloody 24-day career as a...

  • ANOTHER SOUTER? MIERS HOPES SO. Victor, Kirk // National Journal;10/15/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 42, p3197 

    Emphasizes the need for Harriet Miers, a nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court justice, to analyze the approach adopted by David Souter, a New Hampshire Supreme Court justice, during his confirmation hearings in preparation for her session with the U.S. Senate. Reason of legislators for...

  • No More Stealth Nominees.  // Human Events;10/31/2005, Vol. 61 Issue 37, p1 

    Reports on the progress of the nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court Judge as of October 31, 2005. Decision of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers to withdraw her nomination; Requirement for a U.S. Supreme Court nominee; Effect of nominating originalists on the U.S. Senate.

  • Dems sue on contempt. Soraghan, Mike // Hill;3/11/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 28, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. House Judiciary Committee went to court to enforce its contempt citations against White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers. The Judiciary Committee argued that the administration of George W. Bush has no right to block...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics