TITLE

Market is held back

AUTHOR(S)
Bains, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
ICIS Chemical Business;6/4/2007, Vol. 2 Issue 69, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article explains that weakness in the U.S. and Japanese markets continued to hold back the global chemicals market in the first quarter (Q1) of 2007, according to a report by Oxford Economics. In Europe, Q1 production rose by 1.25% from Q4 2006, but sluggish growth in Japan and the U.S. offset Europe's strength. U.S. chemicals output climbed by 0.5% in the first three months of 2007. Japan's production edged up by only 0.4%, as pharmaceuticals suffered from a rise in generics production.
ACCESSION #
25376879

 

Related Articles

  • INDICATOR ADVANCES. Pearlman, Arnold // Chemical Week;1/4/2010, Vol. 172 Issue 1, p40 

    The article reports that the indicator for the chemical industry increased by 1.5% in December 2009.

  • INDICATOR MOVES FORWARD. PEARLMAN, ARNOLD // Chemical Week;11/8/2010, Vol. 172 Issue 27, p48 

    The article looks at the economic indicators affecting the performance of the chemical industry in 2010.

  • UPWARD TREND CONTINUES. PEARLMAN, ARNOLD // Chemical Week;1/31/2011, Vol. 173 Issue 3, p32 

    The article reports on the 1.9% increase of leading indicator for the chemical industry in January 2011.

  • LEADING INDICATORS. Pearlman, Arnold // Chemical Week;5/30/2001, Vol. 163 Issue 22, p41 

    Offers a look at the leading indictor on the performance of chemical industry as of May 30, 2001. Output of chemical process industries; Overview on the overall economy; Employment for two consecutive months.

  • leading indicator. Pearlman, Arnold // Chemical Week;5/29/2002, Vol. 164 Issue 22, p45 

    Reports on the decline of the leading indicator of the U.S. chemical industry in May 2002. Reason behind the decline; Status of chemical production in April 2002; Outlook on consumer spending to be the key to economic recovery.

  • leading indicator. Pearlman, Arnold // Chemical Week;10/23/2002, Vol. 164 Issue 42, p63 

    Discusses the leading indicator for the U.S. chemical industry in September 2002. Chemical industry production; Comparison of leading indicator with August 2002 and September 2001; Rate of orders for construction materials and supplies.

  • Leading indicator. Pearlman, Arnold // Chemical Week;1/22/1997, Vol. 159 Issue 3, p33 

    Reports on the increase in the leading indicator for chemical industry in the United States in December 1996. Home construction as the driver for the indicator; New orders for household goods and construction materials; Decline in retail sales in November 1996.

  • India eyes an upturn. Roberts, Michael // Chemical Week;9/17/1997, Vol. 159 Issue 35, p51 

    Provides information on the economic status of India. Industrial and chemical industry's growth for 1997 compared with 1995-1996; Status of chemicals in India; Pressures in the chemical industry in India; Effect of inflation on the country's chemical demand and industrial output.

  • Leading indicator. PEARLMAN, ARNOLD // Chemical Week;1/27/1999, Vol. 161 Issue 4, p41 

    Reports on the rise of the leading indicator for the chemical industry in December 1998. Decline in the production levels for the chemical industry; Problems faced by the chemical industry; Information on the earnings in the manufacturing sector.

  • Leading Indicator. Pearlman, Arnold // Chemical Week;7/28/1999, Vol. 161 Issue 28, p32 

    Reports the decline in chemical industry's leading indicator due to weak housing market. Growth in new home spending for the second-quarter of 1999; Housing sectors that depend on steady flow of borrowed money and sensitive to changes of interest rates; Decline in freight car loadings.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics