TITLE

Court Derails FCC F-Bomb Crackdown

AUTHOR(S)
Hearn, Ted
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
Multichannel News;6/11/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 24, p51
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the ruling of the Second Circuit of Appeals in New York that the policies of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) designed to crack down on the fleeting broadcast of such words as "s##t" and "f##k" were invalid because the agency failed to justify abandonment of its historic approach. The approach of the FCC focused on the repetitive, not the isolated, broadcast of indecent materials. INSET: Milestones: Broadcast Indecency.
ACCESSION #
25367339

 

Related Articles

  • Court Tosses FCC Indecency Findings.  // InsideCounsel;Aug2007, Vol. 17 Issue 189, p69 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court to overturn the indecency rulings of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) against Fox Television Stations Inc. FCC made two indecency rulings against the television network due to the profanity in its 2002 and 2003...

  • Martin hands media an indecent proposal. Triplett, William // Variety;3/20/2006, Vol. 402 Issue 5, p3 

    The article reports on the regulation of profanity in television broadcasting by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. in 2006. John Crigler, a communications and First Amendment lawyer, comments on the commitment of the agency to regulate profanity. FCC has released...

  • VOLUME CONTROL.  // Multichannel News;6/11/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 24, p26 

    The article presents comments on the issue of expletives in television broadcasting in the U.S. One reader said that "the public has the right to see the real world reflected on their broadcast airways even if it is at times uncouth." Another reader believes that it is the responsibility of the...

  • Split Decision.  // Broadcasting & Cable;6/25/2012, Vol. 142 Issue 26, p34 

    The author reflects on the issue concerning the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) indecency enforcement case. The author states that the court has ended the case in favor of the broadcasters. The author indicates that the court found that FCC had not...

  • Watch Your @#$%ing Language! Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;8/28/2006, Vol. 136 Issue 34, p12 

    The article highlights the commitment of the broadcasters and the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to resolve the indecency and profanity issues plaguing the U.S. television broadcasting sector. CBS agreed that profanity can be said on TV when dealing with the reactions of...

  • High Court Takes Case. Eggerton, John; Weprin, Alex // Broadcasting & Cable;3/24/2008, Vol. 138 Issue 12, p6 

    The article discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the appeal of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on profanity policy. Several television (TV) networks including Fox Broadcasting Co., National Broadcasting Co. Inc. and CBS Broadcasting Inc. have been asking the...

  • LEWD VS. PRUDE. Johnson, Ted; Littleton, Cynthia // Daily Variety;4/29/2009, Vol. 303 Issue 17, p1 

    The article reports on the Supreme Court's first major ruling on broadcast indecency in almost two decades in the U.S. The court has maintained the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) right to punish broadcast networks when profanity slips through on a live telecast. However, FCC's right...

  • Fox Faces Supreme Test on Profanity. Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;11/10/2008, Vol. 138 Issue 44, p3 

    The article reports on Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) appeal concerning the indecency regulation in mass media involving Fox. Oral arguments between Carter Phillips, Fox's attorney, and Solicitor General Gregory Garre focused on FCC's justification to broadcasters concerning profanity...

  • The New Rules of TV Indecency. Heller, Matthew // Hollywood Reporter;7/27/2012, Vol. 418 Issue 25, p42 

    The article focuses on television broadcasting policy of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) related to indecency and censorship. It mentions about limitations that have been specified by FCC related to profanity on television and informs about sexual behaviors which have been...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics