TITLE

Factors Associated with the Loss of Thickness of Polyethylene Tibial Bearings After Knee Arthroplasty

AUTHOR(S)
Collier, Matthew B.; Engh Jr., C. Anderson; McAuley, James P.; Engh, Gerard A.
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Jun2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 6, p1306
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Wear of the polyethylene tibial bearing is a leading cause of failure of knee replacements done prior to the current decade. The objective of this study was to determine how patient-related factors, implant-related factors, and limb or tibial component alignment influenced the amount of thickness loss in polyethylene tibial bearings that were retrieved at the time of revision surgery or after the death of the patient. Methods: We retrieved polyethylene tibial bearings from eighty-one unicondylar and eighty-nine total knee replacements that had been performed because of osteoarthritis with varus deformity from 1984 to 1998. All of the polyethylene bearings had been sterilized with gamma radiation in air. Polyethylene loss was quantified as the change in the minimum bearing thickness per years in vivo (the mean time in vivo [and standard deviation] was 8 ± 4 years). Multiple linear regression was used to assess whether polyethylene loss was associated with age, weight, gender, varus angle of the tibial component, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, initial thickness of the polyethylene, shelf age of the polyethylene, and either the type of polyethylene (for total knee replacements, which were of one posterior cruciate ligament-retaining design) or the manufacturer (for unicondylar knee replacements), and to determine the magnitude by which polyethylene loss would change if any of the significant risk factors were changed. Results: The mean loss (and standard deviation) of polyethylene thickness in the medial compartment of total knee replacements (0.33 ± 0.28 mm/yr) and that in medial unicompartmental knee replacements (0.49 ± 0.40 mm/yr) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the same three variables: patient age, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, and shelf age of the polyethylene. A total knee bearing with a one-year increase in shelf age, a unicondylar knee bearing with a six-month increase in shelf age, a patient who was ten years younger at the time of operation, or a limb that was aligned in 5° more varus (less valgus) had similar effects on the loss of polyethylene thickness in the medial compartment; the coefficients of the linear regression equations indicated that any one of these changes would increase polyethylene loss by 0.11 to 0.14 mm/yr. Conclusions: The wear-related loss of thickness in gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearings from unicondylar and total knee replacements implanted in osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity is influenced mainly by the shelf age of the polyethylene, the age of the patient, and the postoperative angulation of the knee in the coronal plane. Clinical Relevance: Although polyethylene bearings have not been sterilized with gamma radiation in air since the end of the last decade, many arthroplasty patients have polyethylene bearings that were sterilized with use of this method. An understanding of the findings of this study may be of value as these patients return for follow-up care. Whether the study findings have relevance to bearings sterilized with other methods is unclear and will remain so for many years. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ACCESSION #
25315553

 

Related Articles

  • The influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the wear of artificial knee joints. Jennings, L. M.; Bell, C. J.; Ingham, E.; Komistek, R. D.; Stone, M. H.; Fisher, J.; Bell, C I // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers -- Part H;Apr2007, Vol. 221 Issue 3, p305 

    In vivo fluoroscopic studies of patients with total knee replacements (TKRs) have shown lift-off of the femoral condyles from the tibial insert. This study investigated the influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear of fixed bearing (FB)...

  • Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange. Pijls, Bart; Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag, Henrica; Nelissen, Rob // International Orthopaedics;Jun2012, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p1175 

    Purpose: The aim of this observational study was to investigate the optimal minimal polyethylene (PE) thickness in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and identify other risk factors associated with revision of the insert due to wear. Methods: A total of 84 TKA were followed for 11-16 years. All...

  • The Need for Alternative Bearings. Laskin, Richard S. // Orthopedics;Sep2003, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p966 

    The article discusses the need to find alternative bearing surfaces in total knee arthroplasty. It states how polyethylene wear is a continuing problem. It discusses studies done in changing the properties of polyethylene itself. It states that it is useless to try improving polyethylene without...

  • Factors Affecting the Severity of Backside Wear of Modular Tibial Inserts.  // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Feb2004, Vol. 86-A Issue 2, p305 

    Reports on the results of a study conducted by researchers in the U.S., which indicates that new designs of modular tibial components are needed to prevent the generation of polyethylene wear debris through backside wear of total knee replacements. Determination of the type and severity of...

  • Modern Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Cement. Argenson, Jean-Noel A.; Blanc, Gufflaume; Aubaniac, Jean-Manuel; Parratte, Sebastien // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/15/2013, Vol. 95-A Issue 10, p905 

    We previously evaluated the three to ten-year results of 160 consecutive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties that had been performed by two surgeons in 147 patients with use of the cemented metal-backed Miller-Galante prosthesis. The average age of the patients at the time of the index...

  • Current Failure Mechanisms After Knee Arthroplasty Have Changed: Polyethylene Wear Is Less Common in Revision Surgery. Thiele, Kathi; Perka, Carsten; Matziolis, Georg; Mayr, Hermann Otto; Sostheim, Michael; Hube, Robert // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;5/6/2015, Vol. 97 Issue 9, p715 

    Background: The present study was designed to clarify which underlying indications can be currently considered the main reasons for failure after total knee arthroplasty as a function of time. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that included all first revisions of total knee...

  • Total knee arthroplasty 2010. Becker, Roland // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Jul2010, Vol. 18 Issue 7, p851 

    The author reflects on surgical developments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in relation to the near completion of the Bone and Joint Decade in 2010. He references several articles on symptomatic osteoarthritis and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. He notes the introduction of a new diagnostic...

  • Cemented Rotating-Platform Total Knee Replacement. Callaghan, John J.; Squire, Matt W.; Goetz, Devon D.; Sullivan, Patrick M.; Johnston, Richard C. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;May2000, Vol. 82-A Issue 5, p705 

    Background: Although the LCS (low contact stress) rotating-platform mobile-bearing knee replacement has been used extensively, there have been few intermediate or long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up studies evaluating the device. The purpose of this study was to report the nine to...

  • newsflash.  // Good Medicine (Australian Consolidated Press);Dec2006, p13 

    The article reports that a replacement designed specifically for women is now available in Australia. According to the Australian and New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, 14 percent more women than men have knee replacements.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics