TITLE

AT&T and Bell Atlantic spar over New York long distance

AUTHOR(S)
Rohde, David
PUB. DATE
November 1998
SOURCE
Network World;11/16/98, Vol. 15 Issue 46, p43
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Asserts the need for the United States Federal Communications Commission to demand documentation regarding the capacity of Bell Atlantic to provide long-distance service to consumers in New York. AT&T's claims regarding Bell Atlantic's performance as a dominant local carrier; Bell Atlantic claims regarding its ability to meet the standard for order turnover.
ACCESSION #
2519515

 

Related Articles

  • Stirring the industry pot. McElligott, Tim // Telephony;01/03/2000, Vol. 238 Issue 1, p10 

    Deals with the reaction of companies in the long-distance telecommunications industry to the approval by the United States Federal Communications Commission to allow Bell Atlantic company to operate in New York. Significance of the decision in the development of a competitive market; Review on...

  • FCC gives Bell Atlantic OK to go Hollywood. Wharton, Dennis // Variety;1/16/95, Vol. 357 Issue 11, p33 

    Reports on the decision of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to grant Bell Atlantic the right to own programming over `video dialtone' (VDT) phone lines. Approval for a VDT experiment; Court decisions that influenced FCC decisions; Congress' efforts to rewrite the 1934...

  • Bell South, Bell Atlantic say regs jeopardize VDT. Stern, Christopher // Broadcasting & Cable;3/20/95, Vol. 125 Issue 12, p10 

    Reports on the telecommunication companies' plans in using cable as an alternative to video dialtones (VDT) in the United States due to delays brought about by government regulations. Complaints against regulations by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC); Comment by Tom Rawls of...

  • AT&T RULING OFFERS LITTLE HINT OF FCC'S FUTURE VoIP PLANS. Jackson, Donny // Telephony;5/3/2004, Vol. 245 Issue 9, p12 

    Reports on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's decision to deny AT&T Corp.'s petition to exempt the company's phone-to-phone IP service from access charges. Agency chairman Michael Powell's reason for the move; Implication for the market for Internet telephony.

  • AT&T, Just Another Small Company. Kupfer, Andrew // Fortune;5/29/1995, Vol. 131 Issue 10, p19 

    Informs that AT&T is trying to escape regulations that preclude it from changing prices at will. How the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has classified AT&T as a `dominant carrier' since the 1980s, one that can dictate pricing for the industry; How AT&T has asked the FCC to set it free...

  • FCC solution is AT&T's problem. Halonen, Doug // Electronic Media;08/30/99, Vol. 18 Issue 35, p1 

    Focuses on the United States Federal Communications Commission staff's call for the agency to snub the telephone firm, AT&T. Pending decision on the wide-ranging deregulatory relief needed by AT&T to acquire MediaOne Group; Phone company's plan to spin off a handful of cable investments.

  • AT&T/TCI approval sparks resentment. Rohde, David // Network World;02/22/99, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p14 

    Discusses the effects of the acquisition of Tele-Communications Inc. by AT&T. Demand of regional Bell operating companies from Federal Communications Commission to deregulate digital subscriber line and other high-speed access services; Call of hardware and software vendors for the deregulation...

  • FEDS ARE BEFUDDLED. Goldsmith, Jill; McClintock, Pamela // Daily Variety;12/20/2000, Vol. 270 Issue 14, p9 

    Reports on the United States Federal Communications Commission's demand for AT&T to clarify how it plans to meet the commission's conditions on its merger with MediaOne Group. Commission's approval of the deal contingent on AT&T shedding some programming assets or cable systems; AT&T's plan to...

  • UPON FURTHER REVIEW. McClintock, Pamela // Daily Variety;03/08/2001, Vol. 271 Issue 6, p5 

    Reports on the consideration of United States Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell of a directive for AT&T to sell its stake in Time Warner Entertainment (TWE). Factor influencing Powell to review the statute; Deadline for AT&T to divest of TWE; Refusal of the firm to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics