TITLE

Funding Source and Conflict of Interest Disclosures by Authors and Editors in Gastroenterology Specialty Journals

AUTHOR(S)
Bhargava, Nikhil; Qureshi, Jamal; Vakil, Nimish
PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jun2007, Vol. 102 Issue 6, p1146
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Declarations of conflicts of interest have received considerable scrutiny in recent years. AIM: To determine if the leading gastroenterology journals had a formal conflict of interest disclosure policy and the extent to which this policy was followed by reporting of funding sources and potential conflicts of interests of the authors and editors of published studies. METHODS: We examined original articles and editorials in 12 leading journals (determined by impact factor) devoted to gastroenterology and hepatology. We examined the editorial policy of the journal (if available) on the Web site of the journal or in print versions of the journal and contacted the journal for further information on editorial policies. RESULTS: A total of 1,114 original articles and 154 editorials were evaluated from 12 journals. The source of funding for a study was disclosed in 19–99% of the articles examined with only one journal reporting the funding source (or absence of funding) in over 90% of articles studied. A potential conflict of interest was present in 0–13% of original articles and 0–33% of editorials. Only 2 of 12 (17%) journals publicly disclosed the conflicts of interest of the editors to the reader and only 3 (25%) had a formal method for handling editors' conflicts of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Editors of gastroenterology and hepatology journals have been slow to implement guidelines for the disclosure of their own conflicts of interest. Disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest of authors is variable despite the presence of conflict of interest policies at most journals.
ACCESSION #
25137383

 

Related Articles

  • Editor's Note. Achkar, M.D., Edgar // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jun2007, Vol. 102 Issue 6, p1145 

    The article relates the author's perspectives on the report by Nikhil Bhargava and colleagues on the conflict of interest in reporting research results in medical journals. The author cites the researchers' idea that conflict may arise in two levels, one involving the author's possible interest...

  • FOREWORD.  // Current Medical Literature: Gastroenterology;2005, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p1 

    The article discusses the efforts of "Current Medical Literature--Gastroenterology" to provide relevant, up-to-date information on the subject. The editors of the journal place papers into context to help clinicians in relating the findings of research to their practice. The journal also...

  • Towards more uniform conflict disclosures. Drazen, Jeffrey M.; De Leeuw, Peter W.; Laine, Christine; Mulrow, Cynthia; DeAngelis, Catherine D.; Frizelle, Frank A.; Godlee, Fiona; Haug, Charlotte; Hébert, Paul C.; Horton, Richard; Kotzin, Sheldon; Marusic, Ana; Reyes, Humberto; Rosenberg, Jacob; Sahni, Peush; Van Der Weyden, Martin B.; Zhaori, Getu // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;7/3/2010, Vol. 341 Issue 7762, p3 

    The authors describe the changes made to the electronic uniform disclosure form created by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). They acknowledge the authors, editors and other parties who have commented on the form, and claim that the changes they made were based on...

  • FOREWORD.  // Current Medical Literature: Gastroenterology;2004, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p77 

    This article focuses on the journal "Current Medical Literature: Gastroenterology." The journal manages on a quarterly basis, to distil the best of the world literature on gastroenterology into a manageable, easy-to-read journal. The Editors do more, though, than simply summarize the vital...

  • Out in the open: Streamlining system for disclosing payments to docs is good for everyone. Rothman, David; Chimonas, Susan // Modern Healthcare;10/18/2010, Vol. 40 Issue 42, p25 

    The authors reflect on the disclosure of payments to physicians made by drug and device companies in the U.S. According to the author, some of these firms doing so in order to confirm their commitment to increasing public trust through transparency. The authors also talked about author-company...

  • Disclosures, conflict of interest, and funding issues in urogynecology articles: a bibliometric study. Koch, Marianne; Riss, Paul; Kölbl, Heinz; Umek, Wolfgang; Hanzal, Engelbert // International Urogynecology Journal;Oct2015, Vol. 26 Issue 10, p1503 

    Introduction and hypothesis: The ethical behavior of authors, editors, and journals is increasingly placed in the spotlight, by both the public and the research community. Disclosures and conflict of interest (COI) statements of publishing authors represent one important aspect. We aimed to...

  • "Advertising Policies of Medical Journals: Conflicts of Interest for Journal Editors and Professional Societies" Glascoff, David W. // Marketing Health Services;Fall99, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p54 

    The article comments on articles which focused on conflicts of interest among journal editors and professional societies in dealing with advertising policies of medical journals. The author explains the potential effect of such practice on the editorial process. The authors of the articles...

  • Conflicts of interests and investments.  // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;11/23/2004, Vol. 171 Issue 11, p1313 

    Presents information on the impact of the principles and statements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors about conflict of interest on the "Canadian Medical Association Journal" (CMAJ). Revision by CMAJ of its policies; Attempt to draw the line between acceptable and...

  • Medical journals toughen their rules for study authors. Rose, Joan R. // Medical Economics;10/22/2001, Vol. 78 Issue 20, p12 

    Reports that the editors of top medical journals in the United States and other countries have imposed stricter requirements for submitting manuscripts. Reason for the move; Efforts of the editors to avoid potential conflicts of interest in medical research.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics