TITLE

Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not

AUTHOR(S)
Lynch, Joseph R.; Cunningham, Mary R. A.; Warme, Winston J.; Schaad, Douglas C.; Wolf, Fredric M.; Leopold, Seth S.
PUB. DATE
May 2007
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;May2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 5, p1010
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Prior studies implying associations between receipt of commercial funding and positive (significant and/or pro-industry) research outcomes have analyzed only published papers, which is an insufficiently robust approach for assessing publication bias. In this study, we tested the following hypotheses regarding orthopaedic manuscripts submitted for review: (1) nonscientific variables, including receipt of commercial funding, affect the likelihood that a peer-reviewed submission will conclude with a report of a positive study outcome, and (2) positive outcomes and other, nonscientific variables are associated with acceptance for publication. Methods: All manuscripts about hip or knee arthroplasty that were submitted to The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, over seventeen months were evaluated to determine the study design, quality, and outcome. Analyses were carried out to identify associations between scientific factors (sample size, study quality, and level of evidence) and study outcome as well as between non-scientific factors (funding source and country of origin) and study outcome. Analyses were also performed to determine whether outcome, scientific factors, or nonscientific variables were associated with acceptance for publication. Results: Two hundred and nine manuscripts were reviewed. Commercial funding was not found to be associated with a positive study outcome (p = 0.668). Studies with a positive outcome were no more likely to be published than were those with a negative outcome (p = 0.410). Studies with a negative outcome were of higher quality (p = 0.003) and included larger sample sizes (p = 0.05). Commercially funded (p = 0.027) and United States-based (p = 0.020) studies were more likely to be published, even though those studies were not associated with higher quality, larger sample sizes, or lower levels of evidence (p = 0.24 to 0.79). Conclusions: Commercially funded studies submitted for review were not more likely to conclude with a positive outcome than were nonfunded studies, and studies with a positive outcome were no more likely to be published than were studies with a negative outcome. These findings contradict those of most previous analyses of published (rather than submitted) research. Commercial funding and the country of origin predict publication following peer review beyond what would be expected on the basis of study quality. Studies with a negative outcome, although seemingly superior in quality, fared no better than studies with a positive outcome in the peer-review process; this may result in inflation of apparent treatment effects when the published literature is subjected to meta-analysis.
ACCESSION #
25019646

 

Related Articles

  • Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Smith, Toby O.; Ejtehadi, Farshid; Nichols, Rachel; Davies, Leigh; Donell, Simon T.; Hing, Caroline B. // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Mar2010, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p325 

    Controversy exists regarding the clinical and radiological differences in outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare these two TKR designs using a meta-analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED in...

  • Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Cavaignac, Etienne; Pailhé, Regis; Laumond, Gregoire; Murgier, Jérôme; Reina, Nicolas; Laffosse, Jean; Bérard, Emilie; Chiron, Philippe // International Orthopaedics;Aug2015, Vol. 39 Issue 8, p1541 

    Purpose: Because published studies on the accuracy achieved with patient-specific guides during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) contradict each other, this systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare radiological TKA outcomes when patient-specific cutting blocks (PSCB) were used to the...

  • Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survival rate higher in female patients. Press, Robert // Orthopedics Today;Dec2009, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p8 

    The article reports on a study which found a higher survival rate of unicompartmenal knee arthroplasty (UKA) in female patients and in patients who undergo primary UKA at a younger age.

  • Arthroscopic observation was useful to detect loosening of the femoral component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a recurrent hemoarthrosis.  // SMARTT: Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & ;2012, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p8 

    The article presents a case study of a 58-year-old man who was admitted in a hospital in Great Britain with anteromedial pain and hemarthrosis of the knee joint 10 months after undergoing mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). It is reported that, the man was admitted after...

  • Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results.  // Advances in Orthopaedics;Mar2010, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p25 

    The article offers information on the result of a study regarding the viability of bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an option for treating patients with bicompartmental tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in selected cases.

  • Interest in uni knees growing.  // Orthopedics Today;Jun2008, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1 

    The article presents an introduction to reports on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), including implanting techniques and navigation for minimally-invasive UKA.

  • Erratum to: Periarticular Injection in Knee Arthroplasty Improves Quadriceps Function. Chaumeron, Arnaud; Audy, Daniel; Drolet, Pierre; Lavigne, Martin; Vendittoli, Pascal-André // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Jun2013, Vol. 471 Issue 6, p2042 

    A correction to the article "Periarticular Injection in Knee Arthroplasty Improves Quadriceps Function" that was published online in the April 4, 2013 issue of the periodical is presented.

  • Total knee replacement - the evolving sub-Saharan experience. George, Akintunde Oladipo; Ofori-Atta, Paul // Tropical Doctor;Apr2008, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p118 

    Patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee underwent primary elective knee arthroplasty in a well-equipped hospital in Accra, Ghana. Our main outcome measures was the new modified Oxford Knee scores (preoperative and postoperative scores). Median preoperative and postoperative...

  • Knee Society Introduces New Knee Scoring System.  // AAOS Now;Jan2012, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p14 

    The article offers information on the new Knee Scoring System (KSS) developed by the Knee Society that serves as a simple and objective way to measure the functional ability prior and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the U.S.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics