TITLE

Research misconduct? What misconduct?

AUTHOR(S)
Kondro, Wayne; Hebert, Paul C.
PUB. DATE
March 2007
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;3/27/2007, Vol. 176 Issue 7, p905
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the need for Canada to establish formal policies and procedures in dealing with scientific misconduct. According to the author, the country's system for handling misconduct is so haphazard and nontransparent wherein it has become impossible to accurately gauge the efficacy of scientific findings. He suggests the creation of an independent National Research Integrity Agency to handle the misconduct.
ACCESSION #
24990804

 

Related Articles

  • MULTIPLE DIRECTORSHIPS AND CORPORATE MISCONDUCT: THE MODERATING INFLUENCES OF BOARD SIZE AND OUTSIDE DIRECTORS. Schnake, Mel E.; Williams, Robert J. // Journal of Business Strategies;Spring2008, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1 

    This study examined the possible impact of both boardsize and the proportion of outside directors on the link between directors holding multiple directorships and firm misconduct. The study utilized a sample of 181 firms drawn from the financial services sector during the 1999-2003 time period....

  • Incubating Innovation or Cultivating Corruption? The Developmental State and the Life Sciences in Asia. Cheol-Sung Lee; Schrank, Andrew // Social Forces;Mar2010, Vol. 88 Issue 3, p1231 

    A substantial body of literature purports to document the growth of scientific misconduct in Northeast Asia. This article traces the apparent growth of research fraud and falsification to two distinct features of the national innovation systems common to the region: liberal research regimes...

  • Cruising for Bruising. Cohn, Meryl // Just Out;3/6/2009, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p41 

    The article offers an answer to the question on how to deal with an officemate who surfs gay porn obsessively during office hours.

  • The Root Causes of Unethical Behavior. Hoyk, Robert; Hersey, Paul // Graziadio Business Report;2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p1 

    The article offers information on various psychological traps that determine the root causes of unethical behavior in the workplace and their interventions. It explains that primary traps are comprised of external stimuli that impels people to move in a certain direction without regard for...

  • Three Paradoxes of Government Ethics. Thompson, Dennis F. // Public Manager;Summer92, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p57 

    The article presents information on three paradoxes about the importance of government ethics. The first paradox is "Because other issues are more important than ethics, ethics is more important than any issue." Since ethics is not a primary goal of government, it becomes the most important to...

  • Wake-up call on ethics should spur action. Plinio, Alex J. // njbiz;5/24/2010, Vol. 23 Issue 21, p13 

    The article discusses the report "State of Ethics in our Society: A Call for Action" from the Rutgers Institute for Ethical Leadership, which reveals the high rate of observed employee misconducts in the U.S.

  • Assessing Ethical Challenges.  // Healthcare Executive;May/Jun2000, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p33 

    Reports on the three types of ethical challenges for executives. Thinking in terms of priorities as an approach to ethical dilemma; Disagreement on the interpretation of values; Lack of clear guidelines for selected situations. INSET: A Quick Guide to Ethical Decision Making..

  • The Ethics of Compliance Hotlines. Abbott, John // Healthcare Executive;May/Jun2000, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p66 

    Gives advice on the use of built-in mechanisms to uphold organizational ethics. Balance of fairness with human dignity; Strategies to prevent the misuse of the informant mechanism; Protection of innocent employees from embarrassing situations.

  • The Economics of Scientific Misconduct. Lacetera, Nicola; Zirulia, Lorenzo // Journal of Law, Economics & Organization;Oct2011, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p568 

    This article presents a model of the research and publication process that analyzes why scientists commit fraud and how fraud can be detected and prevented. In the model, authors are asymmetrically informed about the success of their projects and can fraudulently manipulate their results. We...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics