Court Nixes Network DVR

Farrell, Mike
March 2007
Multichannel News;3/26/2007, Vol. 28 Issue 13, p2
The article reports on the ruling by U.S. District Judge Denny Chin that Cablevision Systems has violated television programmers' copyrights. The Judge stated that a remote-storage DVR by CableSystems would allow the company and its customers to engage in unauthorized reproductions and transmission of the plaintiffs' copyrighted programs. However, CableSystems remained firm in their belief that remote-storage DVR is consistent to the copyright law.


Related Articles

  • Wireless industry backs opposition to court's digital copyright ruling. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;6/25/2007, Vol. 26 Issue 24, p14 

    This article reports that the mobile phone industry has joined a growing number of groups opposing a lower court ruling in the U.S. that expands copyright law liability. Information regarding the involvement of Cablevision Systems Corp. in the case is discussed. According to critics of the lower...

  • PLAY, PAUSE OR STOP? Baumgartner, Jeff // CED;Apr2007, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p18 

    The article reports on the court decision on a case of breach of copyright laws involving Cablevision Systems Corp. (CS) and Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC) in the U.S. District Court judge Denny Chin sided with TWC in the case and argued that the Remote Server-DVR from CS has breached copyright...

  • Hon. Denny Chin U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. CHANG, VINCENT T. // Federal Lawyer;Aug2011, Vol. 58 Issue 7, p18 

    The article presents a profile of Denny Chin who is a judge on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the U.S. Chin became the president of the Asian-American Bar Association of New York and the recipient of the National Asian Bar Association's Trailblazer Award. He presided over 4,700 civil...

  • It's a Mighty Short Drive from the Harman Mine to the Tennessee Line. LEWIS, BUCK // Tennessee Bar Journal;Apr2009, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p3 

    The article focuses on the U.S. court case, Hugh M. Caperton, et al. v. A. T. Massey Coal Co. Inc., in Tennessee and discusses the influence of campaign contributions for judicial office on judicial decision making. It describes how Don Blankenship, chief executive officer (CEO) of A. T. Massey...

  • JUST JUSTICE. Knox, John C. // Saturday Evening Post;7/24/1943, Vol. 216 Issue 4, p22 

    The article argues that the U.S. civil courts do not need reform as proposed by Judge Jerome Frank of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It offers information on the concerns of Frank regarding court decisions without adequate evidence. It explores how perjury fails to...

  • Three Samples Of Sam Alito. Will, George F. // Newsweek;11/21/2005, Vol. 146 Issue 21, p80 

    The article looks at three court decisions of U.S. Supreme Court justice nominee Sam Alito. Alito is praised for upholding the principle that courts should not improvise social policy in areas where legislatures have made detailed pronouncements. Alito is also praised for a case in which he...

  • Judge in Virginia Rules Individual Mandate Unconstitutional.  // hfm (Healthcare Financial Management);Jan2011, Vol. 65 Issue 1, p11 

    The article reports on the ruling of Judge Henry E. Hudson of the U.S. District Court in Richmond, Virginia on the individual mandate, a key provision of the Affordable Care Act. Hudson ruled to invalidate any part of the healthcare reform legislation. It states that several other lawsuits that...

  • Judicial Attention as a Scarce Resource: A Preliminary Defense of How Judges Allocate Time Across Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeals. Levy, Marin K. // George Washington Law Review Arguendo;Mar2013, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p401 

    Federal appellate judges no longer have the time to hear argument and draft opinions in all of their cases. The average annual filing per active judgeship now stands at 330 filed cases per year-more than four times what it was sixty years ago. In response, judges have adopted case management...

  • Reporters' Notebook. Miller, Valerie // Las Vegas Business Press (10712186);1/28/2008, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p17 

    The article discusses the Clark County's list of top five "Judicial Hellholes," ranked by the American Tort Reform Foundation. The list includes Chicago's Cook County at No. 3 and West Virginia at No. 4. Foundation president Sherman "Tiger" Joyce states that the "hellhole" distinction was given...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics