TITLE

Clean Profits

AUTHOR(S)
Vieux, Alex
PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
Red Herring;4/23/2007, Vol. 4 Issue 15, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on climate change. The five U.S. justices rebuffed the administration of U.S. president George W. Bush in their April 2, 2007 decision. They acknowledged that climate changes does cause harm to the environment and that it is a serious matter the state must address on behalf of the citizenry. They told the U.S. Environmental Protection Administration to set fuel economy standards or else individual states would fill the void. They also pushed government to more quickly resolve pending litigation on environmental issues.
ACCESSION #
24879917

 

Related Articles

  • Green Warfare. Maleske, Melissa // InsideCounsel;Apr2009, Vol. 20 Issue 208, p20 

    The article discusses the reversal in environmental policies of former U.S. president George W. Bush by President Barack Obama. The reversal is expected to change the trends in environmental court fights and, from previously suing federal agencies, environmental groups will shift their ire to...

  • White House, Greenhouse.  // Environmental Health Perspectives;Jun2007, Vol. 115 Issue 6, pA297 

    This article discusses U.S. legislation to address climate change. According to the author, the U.S. Supreme Court's April 2007 ruling that greenhouse gases are pollutants directs the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to study the gases and regulate them if they are proven to harm human...

  • Down Upon the Suwannee. Williams, Ted // Mother Jones;Sep/Oct2003, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p54 

    Discusses the effect of the environmental policy of U.S. President George W. Bush which ban Clean Water Act implementation on the Suwannee River between Georgia and Florida. Chemical companies who favored the environmental policy; Decision of the U.S. Supreme Court about the wetlands in...

  • AMERICAN EYE. Ghazi, Polly // Green Futures;Jan/Feb2007, Issue 62, p33 

    The article assesses on the issues of environmental policy which are starting to progress in the U.S. Congress. The shift in control of Congress has produced a stir of pledges from Democratic committee to put the issue of climate change at the top of their agendas. According to the author, there...

  • ON THE AIR. Kolbert, Elizabeth // New Yorker;5/3/2004, Vol. 80 Issue 10, p33 

    Criticizes the environmental laws of U.S. president George W. Bush. Identification of coal-fired electric power plants as the primary source of mercury, a hazardous air pollutant; Preference to use the cap-and-trade system over the maximum achievable control technology as the means to limit...

  • Bush's EPA -- through the looking glass. Boxer, Barbara // Hill;4/22/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 44, p27 

    The article discusses on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as an agency responsible for environmental protection which over the years have been failing on its commitments. Details related to the issue on the EPA's departure from its responsibilities during Bush administration including an...

  • Bush faces rough ride over climate change. Marris, Emma // Nature;12/7/2006, Vol. 444 Issue 7120, p660 

    The article reports on the challenges faced by U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration with the climate-change policy in the U.S. There is an argument that the Environmental Protection Agency should be forced to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from cars and trucks as a pollutant....

  • Bush climate-change plan gets cool response. Powell, Kendall // Nature;12/12/2002, Vol. 420 Issue 6916, p595 

    Looks at the response of scientists on the plan proposed by the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush on climate change. Plan's lack of clear priorities and detailed objectives; Concern on the administration's lack of real interest in supporting research on global climate change.

  • HIGH COURT CLEARS THE AIR.  // Current Events;4/16/2007, Vol. 106 Issue 23, p2 

    The article reports on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, concerning the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Court said that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide and other harmful emissions from cars. The EPA, however, has claimed that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics