Tate & Lyle tackles Chinese

Baumgarten, Stefan
April 2007
ICIS Chemical Business;4/16/2007, Vol. 2 Issue 62, p33
Trade Publication
The article reports that Tate & Lyle, a British-based sugar and food ingredients company, has filed a case with the US International Trade Commission (ITC), alleging infringement of its sucralose patents by three Chinese producers and 18 distributors. In 2006, the company filed a case in a U.S. federal court against a number of Chinese companies and distributors on the same issue.


Related Articles

  • Sucralose production set to soar.  // Food & Drink Technology;Jun2009, Vol. 8 Issue 9, p7 

    The article reports on the move of the International Trade Commission to make a final ruling which states that Niutang Chemical and other sucralose manufacturers have not infringed Tate & Lyle's patent rights for the manufacturing of the product in Great Britain. It mentions that the move start...

  • Trade Commission Delivers Bitter Pill to Splenda Makers. Phillips, Kate // Chemical Week;10/6/2008, Vol. 170 Issue 31, p44 

    The article reports on the difficulties being experienced by Tate & Lyle concerning their sucralose sweetener product Slenda. The sweetener is manufactured by Tate for McNeil Nutritionals. Tate & Lyle has lost its patent-infringement case at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) against...

  • Tate & Lyle battles on.  // Food Manufacture;Oct2008, Vol. 83 Issue 10, p17 

    The article reports on the plan of Tate & Lyle to fight on in its patent infringement case against viral sucralose suppliers, despite an unfavorable initial ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC). According to the company, the sucralose manufacturing process use by Chinese rivals...

  • Tate & Lyle to take Chinese to court over Splenda sweetener patent infringement.  // Food Manufacture;Jun2006, Vol. 81 Issue 6, p8 

    The article reports on the case filed by Tate & Lyle PLC against manufacturer Hebei Sukerui Science and Technology, in order to stop a Chinese trading conglomerate challenging its monopoly of the sucralose market in the U.S. Tate & Lyle is filing the patent infringement case at the District...

  • JK Sucralose Inc.  // Food & Drink Technology;Jan2009, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p12 

    The article reports on the decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC) judge regarding JK Sucralose Inc.'s infringement case. The judge reveals that JK Sweet Sucralose does not infringe Tate & Lyle PLC's patents and that it has the right to sell the product in the U.S. It notes that JK...

  • Tate & Lyle loses sucralose court case.  // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;May2009, Issue 815, p5 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. International Trade Commission to uphold a court ruling on Tate & Lyle's artificial sweetener sucralose. The court found that Tate & Lyle could not stop several Chinese companies from producing and selling their own version of sucralose. The...

  • Sucralose war looms as Wal-Mart takes the shine off T&Ls Splenda.  // Food Manufacture;Mar2006, Vol. 81 Issue 3, p6 

    The article reports on sucralose manufacturer Tate & Lyle PLC's criticism of the moves by retail giant Wal-Mart Stores to introduce a sucralose-based sweetener called Altern at a 30 percent discount to Splenda in 250 stores in the United States. According to Tate & Lyle, work is still being...

  • Splendid.  // Food Processing (00156523);Apr2008, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p60 

    The article evaluates the Splenda sucralose no-calorie sweetener from Tate & Lyle PLC.

  • Legal briefs.  // Fairfield County Business Journal;5/19/2003, Vol. 42 Issue 20, p14 

    Reports legal developments in Connecticut as of May 2003. Dismissal of the patent infringement case filed by On-Line Technologies Inc. against Applera Corp., Perkin Elmer Inc. and Sick AG.; Decision of the jury on the termination case; Assessment of the residency program.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics