TITLE

Metal Finisher Fined for Environmental Violations

PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
Finishing Today;Apr2007, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Bay State Galvanizing Inc. will pay a cash penalty to resolve Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims that the metal finisher violated the terms of its permit to discharge storm water under the Clean Water Act in the U.S. EPA concluded that Bay State violated the federal Clean Water Act by failing to update and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan at the facility.
ACCESSION #
24851431

 

Related Articles

  • Push for new diesel. McGowan, Elizabeth // Waste News;3/3/2008, Vol. 13 Issue 22, p27 

    The article reports that a bill approved by a panel of the U.S. House authorizes Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to extend the funding of diesel retrofit projects. The bill is meant to reduce air pollution from school buses, trucks and older diesel engines. Democrat Jim Costa...

  • Democratic Lawmakers Seek to Tighten Lead Water Rules. Lorenzetti, Maureen // WaterWorld;Jul2004, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p6 

    Reports that Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. House and Senate have introduced legislative proposals to tighten the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency oversights of lead levels in drinking water. Implementation of the Lead Free Drinking Water Act by legislators; Support of lead reduction...

  • EPA seeks to streamline permitting, increase flexibility. Harrigan, Kate // Pollution Engineering;May99, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p9 

    Reports on the plan of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create a performance-based system that focuses on the environmental performance of facilities. Reinvention of the environmental permitting process; Paperwork reduction; Encouragement of pollution prevention;...

  • EPA Program to Reward Environmental Achievers. Franz, Neil // Chemical Week;7/5/2000, Vol. 162 Issue 26, p22 

    Focuses on the incentive program launched by the United States Environmental Protection Agency to firms whose pollution prevention or waste cleanup programs go beyond federal environmental mandates. Details on the program; Comment from Carol Browner, agency administrator.

  • Next IUR Reporting Period Suspended. Bergeson, Lynn L. // Pollution Engineering;Aug2011, Vol. 43 Issue 8, p11 

    The article reports on the move of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to suspend the submission of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) regulations in the U.S. It states that the move is due to the opposition from the chemical community...

  • Watered Down. Williams, Ted // Audubon;Mar/Apr2009, Vol. 111 Issue 2, p45 

    The article focuses on the Clean Water Act enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1972 to make all waters of the U.S. fishable and swimmable by 1983, then end all pollution by 1985. The law authorized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set limits on pollution by awarding discharge permits....

  • DEP Bills Would Refine Narrative Water Quality Standards. Kasey, Pam // State Journal (WV);3/2/2012, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p8 

    The article discusses a senate bill 562 which was passed by West Virginia legislative assembly which defines the elusive biologic component of water quality standard of the state. The bill creates a standoff between the Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection...

  • TESTING THE WATERS AT THE EPA. Kriz, Margaret // National Journal;4/22/2000, Vol. 32 Issue 17, p1286 

    Focuses on issues concerning the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed water pollution control program. Issue on the legislation introduced by the US Senate that will block the EPA pollution runoff program; Causes of water pollution problems; Arguments on the...

  • Federal Water Pollution Legislation and Its Impact on the Environment. Rosen, George; Kimmey, James R. // American Journal of Public Health;Aug1972, Vol. 62 Issue 8, p1041 

    The author reflects on the impact of the federal water pollution legislation proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the environment. Major changes on the legislation were made which aims to achieve national goals with the amount of federal money allocated by the government....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics