Failure to monitor leads to $1.4 million verdict

April 2007
Healthcare Risk Management;Apr2007, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p3
The article reports on a case sent to the McLean County (Illinois) Circuit Court in which the jury awarded $1.4 million to the plaintiff representing the estate of a former patient at an emergency department (ED) who died because a physician negligently failed to monitor the administration of the drug heparin.


Related Articles

  • Growing Liability Crisis Causes Physician Dissatisfaction.  // hfm (Healthcare Financial Management);Sep2004, Vol. 58 Issue 9, p25 

    Reports on the results of a study published in the July/August 2004 issue of the periodical "Health Affairs," showing that physician dissastisfaction, stemming from the medical liability crisis, may decrease quality of care and strain patient relationships. Survey of specialist physicians in...

  • Not seeing eye to eye.  // Cortlandt Forum;03/25/98, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p170 

    Reports on the case of an eye specialist filed with defamation lawsuit by his patient who is diagnosed of an early open-angle glaucoma. Costs of the settlement of lawsuit; Emphasis on patient confidentiality; Noncoverage of the case in the physician's malpractice insurance policy.

  • The Practice of Uncertainty: Voices of Physicians and Patients in Medical Malpractice Claims. Carney, Patricia A. // Journal of Family Practice;Jun2000, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p577 

    The article reviews the book "The Practice of Uncertainty: Voices of Physicians and Patients in Medical Malpractice Claims," by Stephen L. Fielding.

  • Benefits and Challenges of Informed Consent. Murphy, Joshua B. // Mayo Clinic Proceedings;Mar2008, Vol. 83 Issue 3, p272 

    The article presents a study which provides a summary of the moral and legal underpinnings of the doctrine of informed consent and identify its significant role in the patient and physician relationship. Study shows that procurement of informed consent promotes patient autonomy, engenders trust...

  • Consultation that calls for a chaperone. Cembrowicz, Stefan // Pulse;2/16/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 7, p62 

    Discusses medical consultation that calls for a chaperone for the patient. Need to avoid the distress and disruption caused by any allegation of inappropriate behavior by general practitioners; Need for chaperone to all intimate examinations; Need to acknowledge the patient's body language;...

  • Re: The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice? Ooi, Kanny // Asian Bioethics Review;Jun2019, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p147 

    Highlights from the article: To qualify for treatment injury, a causal link must be established between the patient's treatment and the injury they suffered. They include mental injury as a result of a physical injury or treatment injury, mental injury arising from sexual abuse and a...

  • Fault-free malpractice. Jost, Kenneth // ABA Journal;Jan1994, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p46 

    Reports on the possibility of the use of no-fault compensation for medical injury claims in New York state and Utah. Arguments from proponents and opponents; Use of no-fault systems for workers' compensation and automobile insurance plans; Harvard Medical Practice Study; Decreased malpractice...

  • Malpractice reform debate moves to Senate committee. Luggiero, Gary // AHA News;4/3/95, Vol. 31 Issue 14, p1 

    Reports on the pressure exerted by a coalition of health care groups on the US Congress to pass a medical malpractice law. Recommendations outlined by health alliance; Provisions under malpractice measure passed by the House of Representatives; Criticism against malpractice legislation.

  • Sharing the burden. Larson, Laurie // AHA News;2/12/96, Vol. 32 Issue 6, p7 

    Discusses how hospitals and families should reconcile in medical malpractice cases. Utilization of a mediators to determine a settlement; Nature of the mediation process; Stand of the American Hospital Association (AHA) on the issue of conflict resolution in medical malpractice.

  • The waiting game. Starr, David S. // Cortlandt Forum;3/25/95, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p18 

    Discusses a malpractice suit filed by the family of a middle-aged diabetic patient against a doctor and a local hospital claiming negligence in classifying the patient nonemergent and making her wait for four hours. Background on the case; Dismissal of the malpractice suit in the absence of a...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics