TITLE

What Do You Say When You're Asked About an Ex-employee?

AUTHOR(S)
Rosner, Bob
PUB. DATE
November 1999
SOURCE
Workforce (10928332);Nov99, Vol. 78 Issue 11, p24
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents information on a lawsuit for defamation filed by an ex-employee. Two charges a former employee can sue the employer for; Questions adapted from the `Employers Legal Handbook.'
ACCESSION #
2479888

 

Related Articles

  • Jury dismissed in the Dr Gee case. Dyer, Clare // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);12/1/1984, Vol. 289 Issue 6457, p1530 

    Reports the dismissal of the jury in the libel case of doctor Sidney Gee against the British Broadcasting Corporation in Great Britain. Reaction of the judge on the necessity of the cross examination; Indications of the rules on trial by jury in civil cases; Summary of the main issues in the case.

  • Libel suit dismissed.  // Quill;Sep93, Vol. 81 Issue 7, p15 

    Reports on the dismissal of a libel suit filed by a woman based on the autobiography of Reverend Ralph Abernathy discussing the events before the assassination of Martin Luther King. Claim of defamation by the woman; Ruling by the court.

  • Split libel decisions.  // Quill;Jan95, Vol. 83 Issue 1, p6 

    Reports on decisions concerning libel cases in the United States as of January 1995. Libel verdict against Capital Cities/ABC Inc.; `The Philadelphia Inquirer' newspaper's appeal of a libel case after the reduction of libel damages; Libel judgment against the `Duluth News-Tribune' for its...

  • Libel threat dips. Garneau, George // Editor & Publisher;3/19/94, Vol. 127 Issue 12, p29 

    Presents the findings of the Libel Defense Resource Center on a study of lawsuits won by libel plaintiffs. Number of libel cases in 1992 and 1993; Average libel awards; Results on appeal.

  • Being responsible.  // Editor & Publisher;3/12/94, Vol. 127 Issue 11, p6 

    Comments on the dismissal by a California appellate court of a libel suit filed by a judge against a newspaper that distributed a parody memo purportedly written by him. Viewed goal of news reporting; Comments of lawyer Rex Heinke.

  • Supreme Court rules in Masson-Malcolm action. Fields, H.; Reuter, M. // Publishers Weekly;7/5/1991, Vol. 238 Issue 29, p13 

    Reports that the US Supreme Court has ruled that an author's alteration of quotations by a public figure can be held libelous if it significantly changes the meaning. In doing so, the high court appeared to change its previous holding that public figures must prove `actual malice' before they...

  • Publishers get a three-star warning. Schmidt, Lucinda // BRW;08/11/97, Vol. 19 Issue 30, p34 

    Reports on suits by Demi Moore, Bruce Willis and Jim Carrey against Australian magazines for defamation and how distance is no longer a barrier for legal action. Comments from Leanne Norman of Freehill Hollingdale & Page; Implications and benefits for the law firm Mallesons Stephen Jaques...

  • Discuss firing only with those who need to know.  // HR Specialist: Minnesota Employment Law;Sep2013, Vol. 6 Issue 9, p1 

    The article discusses a court case which deals with the rule that a worker's termination should only be discussed with those who need to know about it, especially in sensitive cases that involve alleged fraud, theft, or falsification.

  • HR MATTERS. Phillips, Emma // Venulex Legal Summaries;2010 Q1, Special section p06 

    The article presents an answer to a question on whether an employee, who has posted damaging comments about the company and his line manager on his Facebook account, can be dismissed.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics