TITLE

What is wrong with intelligent design?

AUTHOR(S)
Dawes, Gregory
PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2007, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p69
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely “specified complexity” (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the existence of a designer: an eliminative argument, an inductive argument, and an inference to the best explanation. Only the first of these merits the abuse directed at it; the other two arguments are worthy of respect. If they fail, it is only because we have a better explanation of SC, namely Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.
ACCESSION #
24783165

 

Related Articles

  • Intelligent Design: Scientific Theory or Religious Conviction? Greenawalt, Kent // Journal of Church & State;Spring2003, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p237 

    Analyzes the religious and scientific aspects of the theory of intelligent design. Comparison between Darwin's evolution theory and the creation theory; Evidence which support the theory; Inferences of intelligent design theory; Issues on teaching religion.

  • "Intelligent Design": A Lamb in Wolf's Clothing. Dobson, Geoffrey // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p34 

    The article presents the author's comments on intelligent design (ID) practices. He criticized ID advocates who claim that ID should be taught in the science classroom as an alternative to the theory of natural selection. He explained why ID advocates particularly focus on scientist Chales...

  • To Be Or Not to Be a Weasel. Shermer, Michael // Skeptic;2002, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p16 

    Analyzes the association between the play 'Hamlet' by William Shakespeare, intelligent design and selective evolution. Use of algorithmic models to emulate natural selection; Justification to the existence of an intelligent designer; Improbability of a monkey to deliver Hamlet's soliloquy.

  • Intelligent Science. Smith, Leland L.; Watson Sr., Timothy F.; Ross, Kelley L.; Seitz, Russell; Witt, Amanda; Doyle, Jerry // American Spectator;Sep2005, Vol. 38 Issue 7, p6 

    Presents letters to the editor in response to the article "The Little Engine That Could… Undo Darwinism," which argued on the use of intelligent design (ID) as an alternative to teaching Darwinian evolution in school science classes in the U.S., published in the June 2005 issue of the "The...

  • Psi Research and Intelligent Design. Benor, Daniel J. // Journal of Religion & Psychical Research;Apr2003, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p69 

    Examines the role of Darwinian theory and Intelligent Design process in influencing genetical processes thereby contributing to evolution. Influence of an organism on its environment according to Conformance Theory of parapsychological by Rex Stanford; Support to this theory provided by works...

  • The Little Engine That Could... Undo Darwinism. Peterson, Dan // American Spectator;Jun2005, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p34 

    Discusses the religious and scientific implications of intelligent design (ID). Concept of ID based on biological sciences and the theory of creationism; Background on the proponents of ID who are affiliated with the Center for Science and Culture in Seattle, Washington; Difference between...

  • Evolution vs. Creation. Donnelly, Matt // Evolution vs. Creation -- Research Starters Education;4/1/2018, p1 

    This article discusses the legal issues surrounding the teaching of creationism and evolution in public school science classrooms in the United States. Since the early 20th century, parents, teachers, and politicians have often been embroiled in contentious debates regarding freedom of religion...

  • Glorious Wild Things. O'Leary, Denyse // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Jun2007, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p26 

    The author comments on the Intelligent Design (ID) controversy. According to him, what this hypothesis can do is enable scientists to investigate instances in nature that show evidence of design as opposed to ignoring them, explaining them away, or declaring them to be outside science. He argues...

  • The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov, Vladimir // Nature;10/21/2004, Vol. 431 Issue 7011, p897 

    Comments on the article about intelligent design, published in the 2004 issue of the periodical "Nature". Suggestion that getting an intelligent-design paper into a peer-reviewed journal is an achievement for creationism; Failure of the article to present new arguments; Rampant proliferation of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics