Court: Dealership wasn't libeled

Freedman, Eric
April 2007
Automotive News;4/2/2007, Vol. 81 Issue 6249, p28
Trade Publication
The article reports that the Court of Appeal in California has ruled that Ed Magidson, owner of a Web site that posted comments criticizing car dealership Raceway Ford, cannot be sued or trade libel, fraud or unfair business practices. Magidson owns badbusinessbureau.com LLC, which operates ripoffreport.com, a site where people can post complaints about businesses.


Related Articles

  • Customers' complaints linger on Web. Harris, Donna // Automotive News;5/14/2001, Vol. 75 Issue 5929, p6 

    Comments on the Web site, badbusinessbureau.com, which posts the complaints of customers. Dominance of complaints against the automobile industry; Difference of the Web site from the Better Business Bureau.

  • Appeals court: GM had a right to deny franchise. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;4/30/2007, Vol. 81 Issue 6253, p34 

    The article states that the California Court of Appeals has rejected a lawsuit against General Motors Corp. by James J. Williams Jr., owner of Miramar Truck and Auto Center Inc., whose application to acquire a Pontiac franchise failed. A three-judge panel unanimously upheld General Motors'...

  • Appeals panel OKs arbitration in buyer's tiff with store. Freedman, Eric // Automotive News;2/25/2013, Vol. 87 Issue 6557, p10 

    The article reports on the order of the California Court of Appeal panel that Andrea Naasz, the purchaser of a 2006 Toyota Sequoia, should arbitrate her argument with the dealership that sold the vehicle.

  • Challenge Based On Arbitrator Nondisclosure Fails.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Apr-Jun1995, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p89 

    Reviews the decision of the California Court of Appeals on a case challenging an arbitration award on the ground that an arbitrator failed to disclose a law firm's former representation of entities affiliated with an arbitrating party. Facts of the case; Limitation of the court's decision.

  • Athletic Center Earns Win in Legal Battle. Mowad, Michelle // San Diego Business Journal;2/2/2009, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p19 

    The article reports on the decision of the California Court of Appeals to reverse a lower court's ruling to throw out the challenge by the nonprofit Community Youth Athletic Center to fight eminent domain in National City, California. The community athletic center and boxing gym was one of the...

  • Chip Worthington vs. City Council of the City of Rohnert Park.  // Native American Law Digest;Aug2005, Vol. 15 Issue 8, p10 

    The article reports that the Court of Appeals First District, California affirmed a judgment of the Superior Court that denied a petition by a group of citizens who wanted to place a referendum on the ballot regarding the city of Rohnert Park's approval of an agreement with the Federated Indians...

  • Calif. Univ. Won't Get Paid for Building on College Property, Court Rules. Freedman, Eric // Community College Week;5/10/2004, Vol. 16 Issue 20, p12 

    Reports on the decision of the California Court of Appeal concerning compensation for the value of the facility built by Azusa Pacific University. Reason of the university for building school facility in Mount San Jacinto, California; Actions taken by the university concerning construction of...

  • Homeschooling Victory. Miners, Zach // District Administration;Oct2008, Vol. 44 Issue 11, p26 

    The article discusses a decision by the Second District Court of Appeal in California to allow parents who do not have a teaching credential to home school their children. It is noted that the state's laws do not address home schooling though in other states there are laws about home visits and...

  • California Court Protects Insurers' Rights To Contest Coverage After Appraisal.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, following p5 

    The article presents the ruling of a California Court of Appeals for the Fourth District in the case Devonwood Condomium Owners Association v. Farmers, which held that upon confirming an appraisal award, a court is prohibited to enter a money judgment for the insured if the insurer questions...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics