TITLE

Detection of Orthopaedic Implants in Vivo by Enhanced-Sensitivity, Walk-Through Metal Detectors

AUTHOR(S)
Ramirez, Miguel A.; Rodriguez, Edward K.; Zurakowski, David; Richardson, Lars C.
PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Apr2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 4, p742
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Since the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center terrorist attack, airports worldwide have heightened their security standards in efforts to discourage terrorist attacks. Patients have become increasingly concerned about whether their metallic implants will set off airport metal detectors. The purpose of this study was to assess rates of detection of various orthopaedic implants by airport detectors with the new security sensitivities. Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine volunteers with a total of 149 implants were asked to walk through an M-Scope three-zone metal detector at two sensitivity settings. Low sensitivity was equivalent to the United States Transportation Security Administration setting for regular security, and high sensitivity was equivalent to its standard for high security. Results: Of the 149 implants in 129 patients who were screened, eighty-four (56%) were trauma hardware, including intramedullary nails, plates, screws, and Kirschner wires, and sixty-five (44%) were arthroplasty implants. Seventy-seven (52%) of the 149 implants were detected by the metal detector at one or both settings. Multivariate analysis revealed that the type (p < 0.001), material (p < 0.001), and location (p < 0.001) of the implant were independent predictors of detection. The overall rate of detection was 88% for prosthetic replacements compared with 32% for plates, with the likelihood of detection being fifteen times greater (odds ratio = 15.0, 95% confidence interval = 5.9 to 39.1) for the prosthetic replacements. All total hip replacements and 90% of the total knee replacements were detected at the low-sensitivity setting. Intramedullary nails and Kirschner wires were not detected. The overall detection rate was 67% for implants in the lower extremity, 17% for those in the upper extremity, and 14% for those in the spine. The detection rate for implants in the lower extremity was ten times higher than that for implants in the upper extremity and eleven times higher than that for implants in the spine. Conclusions: More than half of all orthopaedic implants may be detected by metal detectors used at commercial airports. Total joint prostheses will routinely set off the detector, whereas nails, plates, screws, and wires are rarely detected. Cobalt-chromium and titanium implants are more likely to be detected than stainless-steel implants.
ACCESSION #
24694003

 

Related Articles

  • CAUTION: IMPLANTS TRIGGER METAL DETECTORS.  // CDS Review;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 100 Issue 4, p25 

    The article reports on the possibility that orthopedic implants may be detected by metal detectors according to researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts. Results show that 90% of total knee replacements and all total hip replacements...

  • TKR surgeon sees material innovations on horizon that may decrease wear damage. Rapp, Susan M. // Orthopedics Today;Oct2008, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p18 

    The article suggests the bearing coating options available to patients with total knee replacements (TKRs) or total hip replacements. Surgeon Stuart B. Goodman said that dissolution of the bone, particulate disease and wear are the major concerns when it comes to TKR and hip replacement....

  • Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis. Linder, Roland; MĀller, Hardy; Grenz-Farenholtz, Brigitte; Wagner, Caroline; Stockheim, Martin; Verheyen, Frank // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2012, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p223 

    Background: The statutory health insurance system embodies a large amount of data on the treatments of their members. Depending on joint, prosthesis type, patient activity and comorbidity, knee and hip replacements can last up to 20 years. Based on statutory health insurance data the main object...

  • Revision for Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip and Knee. Haidukewych, George J.; Langford, Joshua; Liporace, Frank A. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;2/20/2013, Vol. 95-A Issue 4, p368 

    The article offers information on the indications, outcomes, and techniques of the revision for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee arthroplasty. It notes that revision is recommended for fractures around loose implants which occur primarily in older patients with massive distal...

  • Analysis of the Self-Calibration Process in a Displacement Sensor in Applications of Hip or Knee Implants. Shiying Hao // Sensors & Transducers (1726-5479);Jun2012, Vol. 141 Issue 6, p106 

    An implantable displacement sensor for postoperative stability evaluation of THA (Total Hip Arthroplasty) or TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) implants proposed in our previous paper [5] features a self-calibrated algorithm to balance the DVRT bridge in the sensor before the measurement starts. The...

  • RSA beads could give insight into hip, knee implant failures. Ford, Omar // Medical Device Daily;1/20/2012, Vol. 16 Issue 13, p1 

    The article reports that a tracking method which uses radiostereometric analysis beads (RSA) for patients with hip and knee implants can give greater insight on the reasons for the failure of these devices after implantation. Physicians at the Midwest Orthopedics at Rush are using RSA to monitor...

  • Total Joint Arthroplasty: Is Perfection Attainable? GONZALEZ, MARK H.; MIHALKO, WILLIAM M. // AAOS Now;Mar2014, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p42 

    The article offers information on the achievement of the desired total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcome. Topics discussed include the obstacles to the perfection of the process, challenges to TJA implants, and factors to the success and failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip...

  • REVISION ARTHROPLASTY WITH USE OF A TOTAL FEMUR PROSTHESIS. Friesecke, C.; Plutat, J.; Block, A. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Dec2005, Vol. 87-A Issue 12, p2693 

    Background:Surgeons performing revision arthroplasties of the hip and knee are confronted with a growing number of patients with extensive loss of bone stock. Implantation of a total femur prosthesis is a possible method of treatment of such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the...

  • Variability in Costs Associated with Total Hip and Knee Replacement Implants. Robinson, James C.; Pozen, Alexis; Tseng, Samuel; Bozic, Kevin J. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;9/19/2012, Vol. 94-A Issue 18, p1693 

    Background: Implant costs associated with total hip replacement and total knee replacement procedures account for a large share of total costs and reimbursements to hospitals. Federal policymakers are promoting eplsode-of-care payment and other value-based delivery and payment reforms In part to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics