Haller, Stephen F.; Gerrie, James
April 2007
Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics;Apr2007, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p139
Academic Journal
The traditional vision of the role science should play in policy making is of a two stage process of scientists first finding out the facts, and then policy makers making a decision about what to do about them. We argue that this two stage process is a fiction and that a distinction must be drawn between pure science and science in the service of public policy. When science is transferred into the policy realm, its claims to truth get undermined because we must abandon the open-ended nature of scientific inquiry. When we move from the sphere of science to the sphere of policy, we pick an arbitrary point in the open-ended scientific process, and ask our experts to give us the answer. The choice of the endpoint, however, must always be arbitrary and determined by non-scientific factors. Thus, the two stages in the model of first finding the facts, and then making a decision about what to do, cannot be clearly separated. The second stage clearly affects the first. This conclusion will have implications about existing scientific policy institutions. For example, we advocate that the environmental assessment process be radically overhauled, or perhaps even let go. It will be our position that ultimately a better model for the involvement of scientists in public policy debates is that of being participants in particular interest groups ("hired guns"), rather than as supposedly unbiased consultants to decisionmakers.


Related Articles

  • Evolving Ethical Concepts. Potter, Van Rensselaer // BioScience;Apr1977, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p251 

    The article discusses environmental ethics and values. It stresses the importance of ethical concepts and the role of the individual scientist and of science in general in the context of changing ethical concepts. The problems of the modern world revolve around land, resource economics,...

  • On Moral Grounds: Bioethics Training for Scientists. Dawson, Natalie // BioScience;Feb2009, Vol. 59 Issue 2, p112 

    The article discusses bioethics training for scientists and how the application of biotechnology to solve environmental problems has triggered ethical questions. Topics include the sociological implications of how humans relate to their environment and the ethical aspects of training scientists...

  • Bioethics: Are Our Priorities Right? Ehrlich, Paul R. // BioScience;Dec2003, Vol. 53 Issue 12, p1207 

    Neither biologists nor nonbiologists in today's society are paying adequate attention to the escalating ethical issues raised by the human predicament, and the expertise of biologists seems to demand they make additional contributions to environmental ethics, broadly defined. Massive...

  • Future Generations, Public Policy, and the Motivation Problem Care, Norman S. // Environmental Ethics;Fall1982, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p195 

    No abstract available.

  • Policy analysts: Shaping society through research and problem-solving. Blanchard, Sadie // Occupational Outlook Quarterly;Spring2007, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p20 

    The article discusses the roles and responsibilities of policy analysts. They are described as workers who concentrate on researching, evaluating and shaping public policy. Policy analysts usually work in one or more areas, such as collecting information, analyzing potential policies and...

  • Social sciences and science policies in Mexico. CastaƱos-Lomnitz, Heriberta // Science & Public Policy (SPP);Mar2006, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p115 

    Mexico has around 800 active social research scientists in a population of 105 million. In 2005 the achievements of the Mexican academic community have earned both international recognition and criticism. A survey of 200 senior social research scientists may suggest that public policies...

  • DIMENSIONS OF NATURALNESS. Siipi, Helena // Ethics & the Environment;Spring2008, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p71 

    This paper presents a way of classifying different forms of naturalness and unnaturalness. Three main forms of (un)naturalness are found as the following: history- based (un)naturalness, property-based (un)naturalness and relation-based (un)naturalness. Numerous subforms (and some subforms of...

  • A Guide for the Analysis of Policy Arguments. Hambrick Jr., Ralph S. // Policy Sciences;Dec1974, Vol. 5 Issue 4, p469 

    Based on what appears to be required for fully supporting a proposal for policy action, a series of interrelated propositional types is suggested as a tool for the design and critique of policy arguments. The kinds of criticisms to which different propositional types are susceptible and the...

  • World view: Experts and democracy. Macilwain, Colin // Nature;11/19/2009, Vol. 462 Issue 7271, p275 

    The article focuses on the author's views regarding the implications of a specialist adviser towards a government. The author states that this adviser can exercise a large influence on government because they were selected on party political grounds. He notes that the advice of a scientist alone...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics