Initial Experience with Beating Heart Surgery: Comparison with Fast-Track Methods

Ott, Richard A.; Gutfinger, Dan E.
November 1999
American Surgeon;Nov1999, Vol. 65 Issue 11, p1018
Academic Journal
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may increase postoperative complications in high-risk patients. The goal of this study is to retrospectively review a series of consecutive patients undergoing conventional CABG using a fast-track recovery method and to compare this series with the initial series of patients undergoing beating heart surgery using either the single-vessel minimally invasive approach or the off-pump multivessel bypass technique with a median sternotomy. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent CABG. One hundred four patients underwent conventional CABG using CPB with a short-pump fast-track recovery method (Group A). Twenty-nine patients underwent a single-vessel bypass via a left anterior thoracotomy off pump [Group B, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)]. Twenty-five patients underwent multivessel CABG with a median sternotomy off pump (Group C). Short-pump fast-track (Group A) patients exhibited minimal complications and expedient recovery and received extensive revascularization. Off-pump multivessel patients (Group C) received fewer bypass grafts, had more preoperative comorbidity, and recovered as quickly as lower-risk fast-track short-pump patients (Group A). Single-vessel off-pump patients (Group B, MIDCAB) were younger elective patients and demonstrated no recovery advantage. The overall mortality was 1.8 per cent. The conversion rates from beating heart surgery to CPB for groups B and C were 10.3 and 16 per cent, respectively. The postoperative hospital length of stay for groups A, B, and C were 4.8 +/- 2.4, 3.9 +/- 1.8, and 5.2 +/- 2.3 days, respectively. Eliminating CPB is not as important as reducing exposure for minimizing operative risk. Beating heart surgery is an adjunct to conventional CABG with CPB. The off-pump multivessel bypass technique is best suited for high-risk patients requiring three grafts or fewer, whereas MIDCAB is best suited for single-vessel...


Related Articles

  • New Coronary Artery Bypass Options.  // USA Today Magazine;Oct2001, Vol. 130 Issue 2677, p4 

    Focuses on the popularity of the use of off-pump heart surgery in coronary artery bypass operations. Advantages of the technique.

  • Coronary artery bypass graft with biventricular microaxial pumps. Meyns, B.; Sergeant, P. // Perfusion;1999, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p288 

    Investigates the use of biventricular microaxial pumps for coronary artery bypass graft procedure. Information on the mechanical support system; Intended clinical use of the device.

  • Editorial To risk or not to risk. Punjabi, Prakash P. // Perfusion;Sep2008, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p253 

    The article discusses various reports published within the issue including one on the use of decision analysis and meta analysis in predicting outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, and another one about ECHO parameters of diastolic dysfunction and the effect of clenbuterol...

  • Angioplasty safe without cardiac surgery backup.  // OR Manager;Jan2012, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p23 

    The article reports that percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) performed at hospital without surgical backup, do not increase the in-hospital mortality or the requirement of the emergency coronary bypass surgery in the U.S.

  • CARDIAC BYPASS without the pump. Munro, Nancy // RN;Oct2003, Vol. 66 Issue 10, p28 

    Focuses on off-pump coronary artery bypass. Surgery for coronary artery disease patients; Risk and advantages of the machine; Inflammatory response; Assessment for postop complications; Other organs affected. INSET: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome..

  • Heart of the matter. Milton, Philip // Money Marketing;1/21/2010, p40 

    In this article the author reflects on his triple heart bypass surgery relative to those people who decided to sell their businesses and give up their jobs.

  • Is coronary bypass surgery really safe? CHUA, PHILIP S. // Filipino Reporter;6/6/2014, Vol. 42 Issue 27, p35 

    The article presents questions and answers related to coronary bypass surgery including whether heart bypass is an open heart surgery or not, whether the heart has to be stopped during surgery or not, and the concept of Robotic heart surgery.

  • Author's Reply. Caluk, Selma; Caluk, Jasmin // Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi;Jan2016, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p69 

    A response from the author of the article "Osmanovic E. Nonthyroidal illness syndrome in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery," in the 2015 issue is presented.

  • Taking the bypass. Epstein, Joseph // New Yorker;04/12/99, Vol. 75 Issue 7, p58 

    Discusses the experience of undergoing bypass surgery. Reactions of survivors of bypass surgeries; Reasons for the author's bypass; Description of the bypass events and results; Significance of the experience for the author.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics