TITLE

Lanham have it: Law and comparative ads

AUTHOR(S)
Retsky, Maxine Lans
PUB. DATE
November 1999
SOURCE
Marketing News;11/08/99, Vol. 33 Issue 23, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article provides information about the Lanham Act, a federal law prohibiting false advertising claims in the United States. Comparative advertising is permitted in the United States, but the advertisements (ad) must compare similar products; one can't compare substantially different products. Under the Lanham Act, one is required to prove five elements to win a false advertising lawsuit containing a comparative claim. One is supposed to prove that false statements have been made about the advertiser's product or one's product and the ads actually deceived or had the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of the audience.
ACCESSION #
2445027

 

Related Articles

  • II. REGULATION OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS. Ostberg, Henry D. // Journal of Marketing;Jul1959, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p79 

    The article summarizes recent case law and legal developments relating to the regulation of product characteristics. In the area of packaging and conditions of sale, some of the court cases include "Mohawk Refining Corporation, et al. v. Federal Trade Commission" with "Royal Oil Corporation, et...

  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Zeuli, Tony; Singh, Ajay // Bench & Bar of Minnesota;Nov2011, Vol. 68 Issue 10, p34 

    The article offers information about developments in judicial law, legislation, and executive action for the area of law related to intellectual property in Minnesota. It provides information and analysis of court cases including Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc., et. al....

  • VI. Procedural and Miscellaneous Developments. Werner, Ray O. // Journal of Marketing;Jan1977, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p98 

    The article presents a number of court cases and legal developments pertaining to government regulation of marketing. The author notes the case of United States Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp., in which the jurisdiction of regulatory agencies over discriminatory rates is discussed. Also...

  • Consumers lack 'standing' under Lanham Act. Retsky, Maxine Lans // Marketing News;2/26/96, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p5 

    This article focuses on the lack of consumers' support and faith on the Lanham Act of the U.S. that prohibits false advertising, referring the case "Barrus vs. Sylvania." According to the author, even though consumers may be the ones most likely to be harmed by false advertising, federal courts...

  • REGULATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION. Werner, Ray O.; Cohen, Dorothy // Journal of Marketing;Jul1971, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p82 

    The article presents information on legal developments in marketing relative to the regulation of unfair competition. The author presents court cases and other legal issues pertaining to advertising, including an injunction placed by the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Medi-Hair...

  • REGULATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION. Werner, Ray O.; Cohen, Dorothy // Journal of Marketing;Fall1984, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p114 

    The article presents legal developments in marketing relating to the regulation of unfair competition. Regarding advertising, the case Federal Trade Commission v. Pharmtech Research, Inc. is discussed, involving charges of false advertising brought by the United States Federal Trade Commission...

  • Rumors & Lies (Book). del Castillo, Diamela // Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science;Summer2001, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p328 

    The article focuses on the Lanham Act which provides protection to anyone who is damaged by false, misleading, or deceptive speech that is made in a commercial context about commercial activity. In Proctor & Gamble Co. (P & G) case the U.S. Court of Appeals, determined that whether the spreading...

  • V. REGULATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION. Brown, William F. // Journal of Marketing;Jul1953, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p94 

    The article presents a number of court cases pertaining to the regulation of unfair competition. The author presents the case of Carter Products Inc. v. United States Federal Trade Commission (F.C.C.) in which the issue of false advertising is discussed. Also presented is the case of...

  • Coalition sues Calif. on green ad rules. Lawrence, Jennifer; Colford, Steven W. // Advertising Age;2/10/1992, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p1 

    This article deals with the legal challenge issued by a coalition of advertising and business groups against the Environmental Advertising Law in California. It is the first major attempt by marketers to thwart state regulation of green marketing. The lawsuit claims the statute is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics