Failure Mechanisms After Unicompartmental and Tricompartmental Primary Knee Replacement with Cement

Fumes, O.; Espehaug, B.; Lie, S. A.; Vollset, S. E.; Engesæeter, L. B.; Havelin, L. I.
March 2007
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Mar2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 3, p519
Academic Journal
Background: Concern exists regarding the durability of unicompartmental knee replacements. The purpose of the present study was to compare the early failure rates and failure mechanisms of primary cemented unicompartmental knee replacements with those of primary cemented tricompartmental total knee replacements. Methods: The rates of failure of primary cemented unicompartmental knee replacements (n = 2288) and tricompartmental total knee replacements (n = 3032) as reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from January 1994 through December 2004 were compared with use of Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates and Cox multiple regression. Results: The ten-year survival probability was 80.1% (95% confidence interval, 76.0% to 84.2%) for unicompartmental knee replacements, compared with 92.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.4 to 93.6%) for total knee replacements, with a relative risk of revision of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 2.5) (p < 0.001). This increased risk of revision following unicompartmental knee replacement was seen in all age-categories. Unicompartmental knee replacement was associated with an increased risk of revision due to pain (relative risk, 11.3 [95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 26.81; p <0.001), aseptic loosening of the tibial component (relative risk, 1.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.0]; p = 0.01) and of the femoral component (relative risk, 4.8 [95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 10.3]; p < 0.001), and periprosthetic fracture (relative risk, 3.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 8.9]; p = 0.02) as compared with total knee replacement. Unicompartmental knee replacement was associated with a lower risk of infection compared with total knee replacement (relative risk, 0.28 [95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.74]; p = 0.01) Conclusions: The survival of cemented unicompartmental knee replacements is inferior to that of cemented tricompartmental total knee replacements in all age-categories.


Related Articles

  • A circumferentially flanged tibial tray minimizes bone–tray shear micromotion. Barker, D. S.; Tanner, K. E.; Ryd, L. // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers -- Part H;Nov2005, Vol. 219 Issue 6, p449 

    Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is the major complication of total knee arthroplasty. There is an association between early excessive shear micromotion between the bone and the tray of the tibial component and late aseptic loosening. Using non-linear finite element analysis, whether a...

  • Towards a standard in assessment of bone cutting for total knee replacement. Barrera, O. A.; Haider, H.; Garvin, K. L. // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers -- Part H;Jan2008, Vol. 222 Issue 1, p63 

    Arthroplasty outcome is influenced by the ‘quality’ of bone preparation for implant insertion. Surgeons face increasing choices of technique and instrumentation, yet clinical scoring methods assess the overall outcome and patient satisfaction but not the bone cuts directly....

  • The History of Mobile-bearing Total Knee Replacement Systems. Hamelynck, Karel J. // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS7 

    The use of a mobile-bearing knee system is routine in modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are indications for use of a mobile-bearing TKA for a growing number of patients. The design, however, was not always well appreciated. Fears of perioperative difficulties and lack of understanding...

  • Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Dennis, Douglas A. // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS13 

    The success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over the past two decades of use has resulted in the implantation of TKA into younger patients who have increased functional requirements and demand increased implant longevity. Improved functional performance requires enhanced range of motion,...

  • Rationale for the Posterior-stabilized Rotating-platform Knee. Maniar, Rajesh // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS23 

    The nonposterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee and the posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing design have been successfully used for the past three decades. Lessons learned from their use have culminated in the design of a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee that incorporates beneficial...

  • The P.F.C. Sigma RP-F Total Knee Arthroplasty: Designed for Improved Performance. Ranawat, Amar S.; Gupta, Sanjay K.; Ranawat, Chitranjan S. // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS28 

    The new P.F.C. Sigma RP-F (rotating-platform high-flexion) knee has been designed to permit 155° of flexion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without compromising wear, polyethylene contact stresses, patellofemoral tracking, or stability. The purpose of this article is to describe the...

  • Clinical Results of Primary Low Contact Stress Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty. Sorrells, R. Barry; Capps, Susan G. // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS42 

    The published clinical and radiographic outcomes data for primary cementless low-contact stress (LCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were examined. The majority of patients (92.6%) were pain free or had only mild pain, and excellent or good knee scores (99.1%) at follow-up. Patella difficulties...

  • The P.F.C. Sigma RP-F TKA Designed for Improved Performance: A Matched-pair Study. Gupta, Sanjay K.; Ranawat, Amar S.; Shah, Vineet; Zikria, Bashir A.; Zikria, Joseph F.; Ranawat, Chitranjan S. // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS49 

    The press fit condylar P.F.C. Sigma RP-F (rotating-platform, high flexion) knee is designed to provide a range of motion (ROM) of 155° without compromising wear, polyethylene contact stresses, patellofemoral tracking, or stability. The first 50 TKA surgeries using the Sigma RP-F knee...

  • Management of the Severe Varus and Valgus Knee Using the Low Contact Stress Rotating Platform. Beverland, David // Orthopedics;Sep2006 Supplement, Vol. 29, pS60 

    Many surgeons feel the use of an unconstrained mobile-bearing knee is contraindicated in cases of severe varus and valgus deformity. In the author's opinion the Sigma LCS rotating-platform knee system can be used in virtually every primary knee irrespective of deformity. The key is to maintain...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics