TITLE

Second Review of Blackboard Patent OK'd; '06 Revenue Rises 35%

PUB. DATE
March 2007
SOURCE
Educational Marketer;3/5/2007, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the move of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to agree to the reexamination of the patent approval for electronic learning functionalities it had granted to Blackboard Inc. The request for a review of the patent was submitted by several computer system providers including Desire2Learn Inc. and Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC). The patent office still has to decide whether to combine the two requests as one review.
ACCESSION #
24342075

 

Related Articles

  • Blackboard Technology Patent Is Under Fire; New Review Sought.  // Educational Marketer;12/11/2006, Vol. 37 Issue 35, p7 

    The article features the opposition to Blackboard Technology's patent for a wide range of e-learning functionalities. Blackboard also sued competitor Desire2Learn alleging copyright infringement. Opposition to the patent and Blackboard's legal muscle-flexing solidified this fall. Most recently,...

  • Should the Patent and Trademark Office Be a Government Corporation? PRO. Kirk, Michael K. // Congressional Digest;Dec96, Vol. 75 Issue 12, p306 

    Presents the American Intellectual Property Law Association's position on the issue of reorganizing the US Patent & Trademark Office as a wholly owned government corporation. Advantages of such a reorganization; Need for the resulting corporation to have effective oversight mechanisms.

  • Judgement protects indigenous knowledge. Sampat, Payal // World Watch;Jan/Feb98, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p8 

    Reports that the decision by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) may have a twist to the debate over intellectual property rights. Cancellation of a patent on the use of tumeric; When the patent was granted; Details on the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research which...

  • PTO wants feedback on China's IP piracy. McCarty, Mark // Medical Device Daily;10/18/2011, Vol. 15 Issue 199, p8 

    The article reports that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has asked holders of patent, copyright and trademark in the U.S. to provide feedback on problems with patent enforcement in mainland China.

  • Declines continue in number of petitions for IPR accepted for trial.  // Inside Counsel (SyndiGate Media Inc.);1/27/2016, p6 

    The article reports on the three-year decline in the number of petitions for intellectual property rights (IPR) that were accepted for trial between 2013 and 2015 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as well as declines when it comes to review for covered business methods (CBM).

  • A History of Patents.  // Hastings Center Report;Jan/Feb2007, Vol. 37 Issue 1, pS4 

    The article focuses on the history of securing patents. One must apply for a patent to be issued for a certain invention. The owner of a patent is given the right to prevent others form making, using or selling the patent without his or her permission. Three types of patents are issued by the...

  • Allocating Power over Fact-Finding in the Patent System. Rai, Arti K. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Summer2004, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p907 

    Focuses on the allocation of power over fact-finding in the patent system in the U.S. Challenges to fact-finding in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent grants; Role of deference to USPTO patent denials.

  • THE USPTO'S PROPOSAL OF A BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH TOOL PATENT POOL DOESN'T HOLD WATER. Iyama, Scott // Stanford Law Review;Mar2005, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p1223 

    Argues that a patent pool proposed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is an inadequate solution to the problem of patent thicketing in the field of biological research tools. Background on the formation of research tool patent thickets and the USPTO white paper on patent thickets;...

  • Strategies for Responding to an Office Action Refusing Registration for a "Merely Descriptive" Mark. Moreno, Mary // Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues;2010, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p116 

    The article outlines the strategies for responding to an Office Action refusing registration for a merely descriptive mark in the U.S. It states that the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) welcomes two strategies to overcome its refusal based on mere descriptiveness, one argue that mark imbeds a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics