TITLE

Are Derivatives Better in Britain?

AUTHOR(S)
Freed, Dan
PUB. DATE
February 2007
SOURCE
Investment Dealers' Digest;2/26/2007, Vol. 73 Issue 8, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the attention received by McKinsey & Co. reports concerning the market for initial public offerings in Great Britain. It states that the U.S. is seeing fewer of initial public offerings because Sarbanes-Oxley legislation has made it prohibitively expensive to be a public company. Another one of McKinsey's conclusions investigation states that London beats the New York when it comes to derivatives.
ACCESSION #
24315178

 

Related Articles

  • Government regulations don't make you safer. Marotta, David John // Hudson Valley Business Journal;5/23/2011, Vol. 22 Issue 21, p6 

    In this article the author discusses the negative effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the U.S. According to the author, the act drives companies to list on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM), and the reduction of the initial public offerings (IPO) on the exchanges. The author also...

  • Risk of Too Little Risk.  // Treasury & Risk;Jul/Aug2007, p8 

    The article reports on a study by researchers from the University of Pittsburgh which compared the investing behavior of U.S. companies with counterparts in Great Britain. According to the article, results indicate that since the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), U.S. companies have...

  • Old Model Is Gone, but Where's the New?  // Financial Executive;Mar2008, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p10 

    The article comments on the difficulties involved in becoming and remaining a public company in the aftermath of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Prior to SOX investment bankers and analysts could bring a small firm public and help it grow. Since SOX, argues Jeffrey R. Manning of Trenwith...

  • Enhancing IPOs. Sharp, Arthur G. // Smart Business Northern California;Sep2008, Vol. 1 Issue 10, p20 

    An interview with Roy Maynard, consulting partner of Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP, is presented. He explains how firms can save time and money by changing their focus on controls. He discusses how compliance to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) inhibits companies from offering initial public...

  • Gunning for an IPO? Not lately. MURPHY, H. LEE // Crain's Chicago Business;10/1/2012, Vol. 35 Issue 40, p0035 

    The article looks at the reason behind the decreasing popularity of initial public offerings (IPO) among private company owners in Chicago, Illinois. According to research firm IPO Monitor, there were only 2 companies that have gone public in Illinois in 2012. One big reason for the lost of...

  • Navigating market maze filled with ups and downs. Romeo, Peter // Nation's Restaurant News;10/16/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 42, p118 

    The article discuses about the pros and cons of initial public offerings offered by restaurants. The high costs, time consumption and relentlessly scrutiny involved due to the new Sarbanes-Oxley act in the process of going public are discussed. The article also explains the the gain in...

  • Spitzer Agrees to Less Regulation to Boost Marts.  // Money Management Executive;1/29/2007, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p2 

    The article reports that governor Eliot Spitzer in New York has backed a new McKinsey & Co. report calling for less regulation, joining in the country's city mayor Michael Bloomberg and senator Charles Schumer in doing so. Spitzer has admitted that the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley corporate governance...

  • Governance Key to Avoiding Compensation Suits. Labaton, Edward; Stocker, Michael // Financial Executive;Jul/Aug2008, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p26 

    The article discusses executive stock option grants and how firms can avoid abusive practices related to them. A 2006 study by professors at Harvard University found that options manipulation was more likely when a firm did not have a majority of independent directors. Although the...

  • Go Public�Stay Public?  // Business Credit;Sep2007, Vol. 109 Issue 8, p32 

    The article discusses the considerations of companies in going public or private in the U.S. Going public enhances corporate reputation, requires less expensive capital for growth and ensures easy establishment of valuation. It is essential that companies have strong balance sheet and financial...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics