TITLE

San Antonio Planning Workshop Project Moves Forward

AUTHOR(S)
Lorek, Laura
PUB. DATE
March 2007
SOURCE
Planning;Mar2007, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p35
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article announces the selection of a developer for the old Swift meat packing plant by the San Antonio Housing Authority (SAHO) in San Antonio, Texas. Finally, the site that has sat vacant for nearly twenty years will be viable again. Fifteen planners for the 2006 National Planning Conference participated to offer recommendations for its development in the AICP Community Planning Workshop held at the site. Franklin Development, a local company, plans to build a $27.6 million apartment and retail complex on the 10-acre Swift site.
ACCESSION #
24245405

 

Related Articles

  • A NEW APPROACH TO URBAN MODELLING. Brotchie, John F. // Management Science;Dec1978, Vol. 24 Issue 16, p1753 

    This note describes a different approach to urban modelling, resulting in a new, more general form of model. The model can be used for prediction, prescription, explanation, or evaluation; or to distinguish between the objectives of individuals, the planning authority, and the community. It is...

  • VIEWPOINT. Burnes, Kelly I. // Planning;Mar2007, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p54 

    The article reports on the use of public meetings as an opportunity for planners and the public to discuss issues related to land use and city planning. When planners reveal their plan and present the map to the public for the first time, the people in the audience look at the map only to find...

  • SOURCE GUIDE. Ross, Steven S. // Columbia Journalism Review;Sep/Oct1975, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p61 

    This article lists a guide to finding information on land use.

  • Landowner Behavior at the Rural-urban Fringe in Response to Preferential Property Taxation. Hansen, David E.; Schwartz, S.I. // Land Economics;Nov75, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p341 

    Numerous authors have commented on the "problems" created by the existing process by which land is allocated among competing uses. In particular, this process has been condemned for the unnecessary loss of agricultural land and open space, the ugliness of sprawled development, and its...

  • "Open Space Preservation in Developing Areas: An Alternative Policy": Reply. McMillan, Melville // Land Economics;Nov75, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p385 

    The preceding paragraph perhaps best describes the situation in those municipalities comprising a central urban area. There, the amount of land available for development is relatively small, cannot be augmented and has limited alternative uses. Such circumstances, however, do not typify the...

  • Residual Space Re-evaluated. Winterbottom, Daniel // Places: Forum of Design for the Public Realm;Fall2000, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p40 

    The article reports on the existence and value of residual space and the effect it has on transforming local communities particularly in Seattle, Washington. Seattle has found solution to its space problem through residual space, which when acquired can provide recreational, spiritual and...

  • "Open Space Preservation in Developing Areas: An Alternative Policy": Comment. Pasour Jr., E.C. // Land Economics;Nov75, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p382 

    The purpose of this comment is to analyze the conditions necessary for the tax to be shifted instead of being capitalized into lower property values for current owners of development property. If the tax is not shifted on to future residents, the implications of such a levy are much different...

  • Eminent Domain Battle Moves to Senate. Goldstein, Scott // njbiz;11/7/2005, Vol. 18 Issue 45, p1 

    Reports on the plan of New Jersey Senator Diane B. Allen to introduce a bill that would oppose the two-year moratorium on municipalities exercising their powers of eminent domain to transfer condemned property to private developers for purpose of economic growth. Importance of eminent domain;...

  • Take a Fresh Look At Eminent Domain. Greenwald, John // njbiz;10/4/2004, Vol. 17 Issue 40, p12 

    Addresses the growing use of eminent domain to condemn property for privately owned redevelopment projects around New Jersey as of October 4, 2004. Prevalence of disputes between state officials and property owners; Complexity of the issue.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics