TITLE

Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states

AUTHOR(S)
Brudney, J. L.; Fernandez, S.; Ryu, J. E.; et al.
PUB. DATE
July 2005
SOURCE
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory;7/1/2005, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p393
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Although a vast literature explores government contracting out for the delivery of publicly financed services, comparatively little of this analysis, whether descriptive or explanatory, focuses on the American states. Accordingly, the present research has two primary goals. It first examines the extent of contracting out by state agencies and the perceived effects of this activity on the quality and costs of service delivery. The second aim is to develop a model of contracting out by state agencies and to test it empirically using appropriate hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) statistical techniques. The analysis incorporates individual agency variables (level I) and contextual information regarding the states (level II). The findings reveal not surprisingly that contracting out for the delivery of services by state governments is very common, employed by more than 70% of responding agencies. State agencies, however, do not seem to achieve the main goals that are advocated by proponents of contracting out, at least not routinely. About half of the agencies engaged in contracting out for the delivery of services acknowledge improved service quality, but barely one-third report decreased service costs. Results of the HLM analysis indicate that most of the variables that help to explain contracting out by state agencies are agency-specific, and that the state-level contextual variables, with the exception of fiscal factors, play a much smaller role. Consistent with some literature, this overall finding suggests that privatization has entered a new, less ideological phase, in which it has become an accepted practice across the American states, subject mainly to the circumstances of individual agencies.
ACCESSION #
23982445

 

Related Articles

  • Outsource? Out of the Question! Kitchens, Susan // Forbes Global;5/12/2003, Vol. 6 Issue 10, p16 

    Explains that federal and state governments in the U.S. are not exploiting the opportunity of contracting out some of their services abroad. Savings and efficiency that can be achieved by the governments by contracting out some of their services abroad; Trend among private companies to...

  • Are You Ready to Outsource Staffing? Laabs, Jennifer // Workforce (10928332);Apr2000, Vol. 79 Issue 4, p56 

    Explores contracting out of employees for companies in the United States. Cost of contracting out in the human resources; Criteria for contracting out of employee recruitment; Decision making on contracting out of staffing function.

  • Diffusion of Regulatory Policy Across Nations. WU, Irene S. // Communications & Strategies;2014 3rd Quarter, Issue 95, p111 

    Out of around 200 countries in the world, only 75 have number portability. What are the international factors that explain the diffusion of this regulatory policy? Research on policy diffusion offers several explanations: constructivist, coercion, competition, and learning. Each of these...

  • For small businesses, outsourcing is in. P.D. // Practical Accountant;Nov96, Vol. 29 Issue 11, p1/4 

    Reports on the results of a survey of accounting consultants conducted by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants concerning the growing trend among businesses in the United States to contract out their business functions. Business function most likely to be contracted out;...

  • Asserting Government Control over Subcontractors. Singer, Scott W. // Army Lawyer;Sep94, Issue 262, p11 

    Explores contract clauses and explains the policies and procedures that apply when the government gains control over subcontractors through contract clauses in the United States.

  • THE ENGLISH VERSUS THE AMERICAN RULE ON ATTORNEY FEES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PUBLIC COMPANY CONTRACTS. Eisenberg, Theodore; Miller, Geoffrey P. // Cornell Law Review;Jan2013, Vol. 98 Issue 2, p327 

    The American rule for attorney fees requires each party to pay its attorney, win or lose; the English rule (applicable in most of the world) requires the losing party to pay the winner's reasonable attorney fees. We study fee clauses in 2,347 contracts in large corporations' public securities...

  • The Productivity Slowdown, Sectoral Reallocations and the Growth of Atypical Employment Arrangements. Magnani, E. // Journal of Productivity Analysis;Sep2003, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p121 

    This paper explores the recent shifts in employment arrangements away from long-term employment contracts and internal labor markets towards outside contracting of labor in OECD countries. It examines the driving forces behind this phenomenon, focusing on the relationship with another important...

  • Beware of assumed liability when signing contracts. Dean, Tim // Hudson Valley Business Journal;03/26/2001-04/02/2001, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p6 

    Explains the need for caution in exploring assumed liability issues involved in signing contracts. Understanding of the basic types of indemnity agreements; Differences among broad, intermediate and limited forms of assumed liability in contracts.

  • Ego identity status in cross-cultural context: A comparison of Norwegian and United States... Jensen, Mette; Kroger, Jane // Psychological Reports;Oct98, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p455 

    Examines patterns of identity development by comparing adolescents raised in Norway's welfare-state system with American teeners exposed to the free market economy. Effect of culture on both the ideological and interpersonal domains; Emphasis on individual exploration and commitment among the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics