Explanation and the Hard Problem

Wright, Wayne
January 2007
Philosophical Studies;Jan2007, Vol. 132 Issue 2, p301
Academic Journal
This paper argues that the form of explanation at issue in the hard problem of consciousness is scientifically irrelevant, despite appearances to the contrary. In particular, it is argued that the ‘sense of understanding’ that plays a critical role in the form of explanation implicated in the hard problem provides neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition on satisfactory scientific explanation. Considerations of the actual tools and methods available to scientists are used to make the case against it being a necessary condition, and work by J.D. Trout that exploits psychological research on the hindsight and overconfidence biases is used to show that it is not a sufficient condition. It is argued, however, that certain intellectual and moral concerns give us good reason to still try to meet the hard problem’s explanatory challenge, despite its extrascientific nature.


Related Articles

  • Explaining the Explanation. Downie, R. S. // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1970, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p169 

    This article discusses the concept and nature of explanation as a means of human communication, a species of rhetoric or a kind of pedagogy. The advantage of approaching the concept of explanation from a special subject matter, particularly science, is that the concept is discussed in contexts...

  • UN ANáLISIS CRíTICO DE LA CONCEPCIóN MECANICISTA DE LA EXPLICACIóN. Barberis, Sergio Daniel // Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia;pri2013, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p233 

    In this paper, I offer a critical assessment of the mechanicist approach to scientific explanation. Firstly, I argue that the mechanicist characterization of (non explanatory) phenomenological models is inadequate, since it does not develop an explication of the concepts of scientific model and...

  • Understanding and the Norm of Explanation. Turri, John // Philosophia;Dec2015, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p1171 

    I propose and defend the hypothesis that understanding is the norm of (the speech act of) explanation. On this proposal, an explanation should express understanding. I call this the understanding account of explanation. The understanding account is supported by social and introspective...

  • Frame of Reference.  // New Yorker;11/19/1955, Vol. 31 Issue 40, p44 

    The article talks about a mother explaining to her daughter when she will be home from a hospital. The mother with an injured elbow told her daughter that after four days she will be home. The daughter said that she could not count four days. The mother told the little girl that she will be home...

  • INFERENTIALISM AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE. Cogburn, Jon // Behavior & Philosophy;2004, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p503 

    A central tenet of cognitivism is that knowing how is to be explained in terms of tacitly knowing that a theory is true. By critically examining canonical anti-behaviorist arguments and contemporary appeals to tacit knowledge, I have devised a more explicit characterization in which tacitly...

  • Ephemeral Mechanisms and Historical Explanation. Glennan, Stuart // Erkenntnis;Mar2010, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p251 

    While much of the recent literature on mechanisms has emphasized the superiority of mechanisms and mechanistic explanation over laws and nomological explanation, paradigmatic mechanisms—e.g., clocks or synapses—actually exhibit a great deal of stability in their behavior. And while...

  • A Defense of Lucky Understanding. Morris, Kevin // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Jun2012, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p357 

    It is plausible to think that the epistemic benefit of having an explanation is understanding. My focus in this article is on the extent to which explanatory understanding, perhaps unlike knowledge, is compatible with certain forms of luck—the extent to which one can understand why...

  • To Explain: A Review of Research. Rosenshine, Barak // Educational Leadership;Dec1968, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p303 

    The article examines available research studies concerning the importance of teachers' ability to explain on effective teaching and education. Explaining was defined as the skill of engendering comprehension of a process, concept or generalization. The studies about the ability to explain...

  • A normative account of the need for explanation. Wong, Wai-hung; Yudell, Zanja // Synthese;Oct2015, Vol. 192 Issue 9, p2863 

    Although explanation is a central topic in the philosophy of science, there is an important issue concerning explanation that has not been discussed much, namely, why some phenomena need an explanation while some do not. In this paper we first explain why this is an important issue, and then...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics