TITLE

NOW Rallies to Save Affirmative Action

AUTHOR(S)
Afriyie, Rose
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
National NOW Times;Winter2007, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the National Organization for Women (NOW) have rallied outside the U.S. Supreme Court to promote diverse student bodies and prevent segregation in public schools in Louisville, Kentucky, and Seattle, Washington. NOW President Kim Gandy addressed the crowd to stand up against segregation of all kinds. The two school districts in the cases struggle with radically segregated schools resulting from sharply segregated neighborhoods.
ACCESSION #
23875334

 

Related Articles

  • High court will hear case challenging affirmative action in college admissions.  // American School & University Exclusive Insight;2/21/2012, p3 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a white student's allegation that the University of Texas's race-conscious admission policy cost her a spot in the freshman class.

  • Affirmative action: Let's not be fooled by flawed theories. ONWUACHI, ANGELA // Inside Tucson Business;6/21/2013, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p17 

    The article offers the author's view on the much awaited decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on the court case Fisher vs. University of Texas in Texas regarding affirmative action practices at colleges and universities.

  • Supreme Court creates affirmative inaction. Prince, Zenitha // Michigan Citizen;5/4/2014, Vol. 36 Issue 26, pA5 

    The article discusses issues regarding the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold states' right to ban the use of race-sensitive policies in university admissions, creating a serious impact on affirmative action.

  • Lessons Learned on My Journey to the Fisher Sports Brief, and Beyond. ROSNER, JAY // University of San Francisco Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p315 

    The article presents a speech by executive director of the Princeton Review Foundation Jay Rosner delivered at the University of San Francisco Law Review Symposium on February 22, 2013. Topics discussed include the U.S Supreme Court case Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School...

  • Race-Related Cases Drew High Court Focus. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;7/10/2013, Vol. 32 Issue 36, p27 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's 2013 decisions in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin and Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, which both addressed the role of race in education. It examines how the Fisher case will impact affirmative action in college admission policies and how...

  • A Preference for Equality: Seeking the Benefits of Diversity Outside the Educational Context. Harvey, David A. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2007, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p55 

    The article discusses the judicial recognition of diversity which justifies the use of race-conscious affirmative action plans (AAP) in the educational settings in the U.S. The Supreme Court has found the benefits of diversity to be real and substantial. Thus, it also acknowledged the need for...

  • Supreme Court Confused By Reverse Discrimination. Flygare, Thomas J. // Phi Delta Kappan;Sep86, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p77 

    This article discusses the complex and confusing legal issues surrounding cases involving affirmative action and reverse discrimination, based on the analysis of several cases dealt by the U.S. Supreme Court, as of September 1986. In Wygant v. Jackson (Michigan) Board of Education), decided on...

  • Supreme Court upholds racist ruling. SHEPPARD, BARRY // Green Left Weekly;5/7/2014, Issue 1007, p20 

    The article informs that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on April 22, 2014 that states can ban affirmative action in admissions to public universities, and states that the issue was a constitutional amendment in Michigan that banned the consideration of race in admissions to educational institutions.

  • Final Blow to Affirmative Action? Miah, Malik // Against the Current;Nov/Dec2012, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p2 

    In the article, the author discusses the concept of affirmative action. He claims that the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Fisher v. University of Texas showed that the court is trying to suppress the concept. In the case, Abigail Fisher filed a lawsuit claiming that she was not...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics