Chadwick, Karen L.
November 2006
Albany Law Review;2006, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p117
Academic Journal
The article focuses on the legal approaches to employment discrimination based on off-duty smoking. It examines the constitutional, statutory and common law background and basis for the differing views on employment discrimination based on leisure-time smoking. It reviews the arguments favoring allowance of discrimination against employees who smoke. It recommends that an equitable approach to employer discrimination should balance the concerns of smokers with those of their employers.


Related Articles

  • Workplace Matters. Greenwald, Joel J. // Hudson Valley Business Journal;2/6/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p25 

    The article provides information on the responsibilities of employers pertaining to accommodation of the rights and preferences of both smokers and nonsmokers in the workplace. An employer should maintain smoking policies in the workplace to prevent health diseases particularly lung cancer and...

  • Smokers not protected by disability law. Byard, Roger // Personnel Today;1/17/2006, p3 

    The article presents a case in Great Britain highlighting the vulnerability of employees during the first year of their employment. The case presented in the paper is of a young woman who was fired on the first day of her new job for being a smoker. The woman cannot allege disability...

  • Some employers filter out smokers. Olson, Scott // Indianapolis Business Journal;11/22/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 37, p19A 

    Examines the law in Indiana protecting smokers from employment discrimination. History of the establishment of the law that forbids employers from discriminating against employees based on their use of tobacco products; Key provisions of the state's smoking laws; Health insurance costs of...

  • Does not hiring smokers improve health or damage it?  // New Scientist;1/31/2009, Vol. 201 Issue 2693, p5 

    The article addresses the potential health impacts of antismoking policy in the workplace. Banning smoking in the office is one thing, but refusing to hire smokers may damage their health and exacerbate social inequalities. The World Health Organization (WHO) stopped hiring smokers in 2005,...

  • New York Employers Required to Provide Time Off for Expressing Breast Milk and for Donating Blood.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q3, p1 

    The article focuses on the implementation of a legislation signed by New York Governor Eliot Spitzer which requires employers in the state to provide a break time for mother employees to express breast milk and a leave of at least 3 hours in any 12-month period for blood donor employees. Also,...

  • EMPLOYMENT LAW TIMETABLE.  // Personnel Today;10/24/2006, p21 

    The article presents information on various legislations related to the employment law which are to be enacted in 2007 in Great Britain. One of the legislations is introduced by the Commission for Equality and Human Rights for the laws outlawing workplace discrimination on grounds of age, and...

  • Smoking and discrimination. Dhindsa, Ranjit; Feinstein, Naomi // Personnel Today;6/26/2007, p18 

    The article focuses on the discrimination against people with smoking habit by employers in their hiring practices. It is noted that employers need to consider whether it is appropriate to refuse to employ smokers or ex-smokers. With no smoking protection legislation, the employees may have to...

  • Our right to do ourselves harm.  // New Scientist;1/31/2009, Vol. 201 Issue 2693, p3 

    The author considers the refusal of employers to hire smokers. The author explains why banning smoking in the workplace was a win-win move. Some companies in the U.S. are refusing to hire anyone who smokes, even off duty. Organisations that cover their employees' health insurance, as many do,...

  • RGANIZATIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF FREQUENT SMOKING BREAKS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Daniel Lahammer; Diego Lopez; Thuc Trinh "Lee"; Chet Barney // Allied Academies International Conference: Proceedings of the Ac;Fall2015, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p6 

    Much has been publicized demonstrating that smoking is hazardous to the tobacco user's health, yet much is still unknown about the hazards smoking has on an organization itself. Commonly, the physical location where smoking is allowed has diminished, thus causing smokers to travel varying...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics