TITLE

The Secret Refund Booth

AUTHOR(S)
Ackerman, Bruce; Ayres, Ian
PUB. DATE
September 2006
SOURCE
University of Chicago Law Review;Fall2006, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p1107
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article recommends the enforcement into law of the so called, the secret refund booth, as a strategy in mandatory publicity of contributions and refunds of individuals to campaign funds of political candidates in the U.S. The secret refund booth allows the Federal Election Commission to disclose the full amount of each contribution to the candidates and the public, while the donor is given a five-day cooling off period to refund his contribution.
ACCESSION #
23802274

 

Related Articles

  • The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002.  // Supreme Court Debates;Nov2003, Vol. 6 Issue 8, p227 

    Provides an overview of the U.S. Federal Election Commission's implementation of revised rules on provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Prohibition of national parties from raising or spending nonfederal funds; Fundraising by federal and nonfederal candidates on behalf of...

  • FEC Adopts Limited New Rule Regulating 527s.  // Association Management;Oct2004, Vol. 56 Issue 10, p9 

    Reports on the United States Federal Election Commission's adoption of the rule requiring some groups to use federally regulated hard money to pay for some of their expenses. Reasons behind the agency's move; Key provisions of the rule.

  • Magic Words. Rosen, Jeffrey // New Republic;9/29/2003, Vol. 229 Issue 13, p16 

    At the Supreme Court, after a four-hour marathon of oral arguments about the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law --officially known as the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, or BCRA -- only one thing was clear: Unless the Court wants to reconsider three decades of its own precedents, it...

  • Money talks.  // Christian Century;4/30/2014, Vol. 131 Issue 9, p7 

    The article discusses campaign finance regulations, in reference to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission. The case reportedly involves financial contributions of individuals to political candidates or political parties they support. Topics explored...

  • Robertson owes $400,000 for `88 bid.  // Christian Century;11/3/93, Vol. 110 Issue 31, p1083 

    Reports on the US Federal Election Commission's order to television evangelist Pat Robertson to repay the Treasury the expenditures from his 1988 quest for the Republican presidential nomination. Election-law violations; Call for the investigation of Robertson's political arm, the Christian...

  • SQUARE PEGS: THE CHALLENGES FOR EXISTING FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE LAWS IN THE AGE OF THE SUPER PAC. Bauerly, Cynthia L.; Hallstrom, Eric C. // New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy;Spring2012, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p329 

    An essay is presented on the individuals who are elected by the public for serving in government and the accountability of these individuals. The importance of free elections, need of additional accountability in the U.S. federal electoral system and the limitations of Federal Election Campaign...

  • FEC v. Christian Coalition.  // Current Legal Documents;1950-, p0 

    Presents a lawsuit filed by the United States Federal Election Commission (FEC) against the Christian Coalition. Allegations that the Christian Coalition violated Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971; Political elections the Coalition helped to fund; Outcome of the case.

  • As Political Groups Push Envelope, FEC Gridlock Gives 'De Facto Green Light'. Wang, Marian // Pro Publica;11/ 7/2011, p1 

    The article discusses the challenges faced by the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce campaign-finance law in the wake of the 2012 U.S. Presidential elections. It says that FEC has yet to provide a single rule to address super political action committees (PACs), which serve as...

  • The Money Game: Changing the Rules.  // Time;2/9/1976, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p10 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on campaign finance of the 1976 presidential candidates based on the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974. It says that the law's rule restricting the campaign contributions to 1000 dollars was left intact, though the court...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics