Improved Study Finds Index Management Usually Outperforms Active Management

Holmes, Millicent
January 2007
Journal of Financial Planning;Jan2007, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p48
Academic Journal
This study seeks to improve in several ways upon previous studies examining the relative performance of index management versus active management. It concludes that index management outperforms active management in most asset classes. • To make comparisons between index management and active management as accurate as possible, the study segregated funds by style and then compared funds of the same style. This "apples to apples" comparison Is the most accurate methodology. Many other studies suffer from some level of benchmark mis-specification or "size bias," as they compare all actively managed funds, which include Large, Mid-, Small-, and Micro-cap funds to a Large-Cap Blend index, the S&P 500. • Many studies on indexing versus active management have used only gross returns, which tend to overstate active manager fund performance. By contrast, this study examines fund performance net of management fees, expenses, and the impact of taxes. • Also, these studies typically have used commercial mutual fund databases as their investment universe Unfortunately, all commercial databases suffer from survivor bias, overstating the returns for the universe of active managers that have survived to the present date. This study uses "survivor-biased minimized" data to help solve this difficulty. • In general, index management outperformed active management in the Large Cap Blend,Value, and Growth asset classes The results in Mid-Cap were mixed, with active Mid-Cap Value outperforming index management for most periods. Active management also outperformed in active Small-Cap Blend and international Mid/Small-Cap Blend. • Surprisingly, indexing outperformed active management in the active Small-Cap Value and Growth asset classes, precisely the asset classes in which one would expect active management to outperform index management.


Related Articles

  • FM Letters. Allen, David S.; Thompson, G. Rodney; Shyy, Gang; Nein, Annie; Ghosh, Dilip K.; Gray, H. Peter; McDaniel, William R. // FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association;Winter1991, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p7 

    The article presents letters to the editor on topics related to financial management. A reader says that occasionally, the composition of the S&P 500 Index changes. Because of the desire of certain index funds to closely track the performance of the S&P 500 Index, changes in the composition of...

  • Money Management Where's the next big thing?  // Money Management;4/8/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 12, p14 

    Reports on trends in financial planning in Australia in 2004. Popularity of listed investment companies; Blurring of the lines between retail and wholesale; Growth of niche products; Increased sophistication of clients and financial advisers.

  • Client bank values buck the trend.  // Money Marketing;11/26/2009, p64 

    The article offers information on various developments in the independent financial adviser (IFA) business in Great Britain. It denotes that there have been new businesses requirements from clients. It also mentions that the demand for new businesses opportunities is very high and business...

  • Sipps steam ahead.  // Money Marketing;5/18/2006, p46 

    The article focuses on the significance of self-invested pension plan (SIPP) scheme in providing an alternative investment opportunity to financial advisers in Great Britain. Today, more insurance companies have decided to offer their group personal pension offerings through the use of a group...

  • Adam Samuel: The perils of treating insistent clients as execution-only.  // Money Marketing (Online Edition);4/17/2014, p44 

    In this article the author views that financial advisers need to remember that they are paid for their advice, and they need to be prepared to say no to their clients. The author furthers views that advisers have both to explain the limits of what can be achieved financially and work with the...

  • HOW THE INSTITUTIONS WIELD THEIR POWER. Dunham, Robin // Accountancy;Nov89, Vol. 104 Issue 1155, p74 

    This article examines the institutional ownership of listed equities in Great Britain. The increased competition by fund managers for institutional investment funds has put even more emphasis on short term performance. Because no fund manager can risk being seen to underperform too far in case...

  • L&G fee cut: Latest skirmish in the index fund price war? Jackson, Gary // Fundweb;4/9/2013, p20 

    The article discusses the likelihood that more passive fund providers in Great Britain will reduce fees to remain competitive after financial services firm Legal and General (L&G) reduced its annual management charges (AMC) by up to 25 percent. It mentions L&G's lowering of the AMCs on its...

  • How 'Smart' Is Smart Beta? Lisanti, Joseph // Financial-planning.com;10/16/2014, p8 

    The article reports that U.S. investment services provider Charles Schwab hosted a discussion of alternative methods of weighting index funds, called "smart beta," in New York in October 2014. Topics discussed include the leaders of exchange-traded fund and index businesses who took part in the...

  • Fidelity puts the cat among the fat-fee pigeons. Teasdale, James // Fund Strategy;10/3/2005, p12 

    Points out that Fidelity's decision to lower the annual management charge on is MoneyBuilder UK Index fund to 0.1 percent throws up a number of questions relating to retail fund management fees in Great Britain. Issue on whether they can justify charging customers these fees for a product that...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics