TITLE

Intel Ordered to Produce Foreign Discovery in AMD Antitrust Suit

AUTHOR(S)
Mutschler, Ann Steffora
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
Electronic News;1/8/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p9
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the ruling issued by the Federal District Court in Delaware concerning a case involving Intel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). The court overruled Intel's objections and ordered it to produce documents and other evidence bearing upon Intel's exclusionary conduct outside of U.S. borders. This current battle between the microprocessor rivals goes back to June 2005, when a lawsuit filed by AMD accused Intel of monopolizing the x86 microprocessor market by coercing customers not to deal with AMD.
ACCESSION #
23716415

 

Related Articles

  • Intel, AMD will argue `ICE' issue as motion bids for new 287 trial. DeTar, Jim // Electronic News;5/30/94, Vol. 40 Issue 2016, p1 

    Reports on Intel Corporation's attempt to reopen its case against Advanced Micro Devices Inc. regarding the 287 math processor while continuing its lawsuit concerning the Am486 devices' use of in-circuit emulation (ICE) technology. Background of the two separate cases; Varying significance of...

  • What's a Monopoly to Do? Yager, Tom // InfoWorld;8/15/2005, Vol. 27 Issue 33, p52 

    This article comments on the AMD versus Intel antitrust lawsuit. A source close to the lawsuit has said that AMD is not suing Intel because Intel is a monopoly; it is suing Intel for abusing its monopoly powers to maintain its control of the market. AMD is not suing Intel for being too big, too...

  • Intel brands AMD lawsuit as 'factually incorrect'.  // Electronics Weekly;9/7/2005, Issue 2208, p3 

    The article reports that Intel Corp. is hotly contesting a lawsuit initiated by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) regarding Intel's business practices, and maintaining that its business practices are both fair and lawful. According to a spokesperson of Intel, although AMD has purportedly brought...

  • Ninth Circuit Adopts Broad View of US Discovery Rights Available to Foreign Tribunals and Litigants. Holian, Joshua N. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article reports that a broad interpretation of the law granting foreign tribunals and parties power to take discovery in the U.S. has been adopted by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. It highlights the case Advanced Micro Devices Inc. versus Intel Corp. The Ninth Circuit joined the...

  • Judge Dismisses AMD's Antitrust Claims Against Intel. Taylor, Colleen // Electronic News;10/2/2006, Vol. 52 Issue 40, p47 

    The article reports on the court's decision in the antitrust claims filed by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. against Intel Corp. Advanced Micro accuses Intel of monopolizing the x86 microprocessor market by coercing customers not to deal with Advanced Micro. Judge Joseph Farnan dismissed the claims...

  • AMD Claims Supreme Court Victory, Intel Disagrees. Mutschler, Ann Steffora // Electronic News;6/28/2004, Vol. 50 Issue 26, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the victory of Advanced Micro Devices Inc. in an antitrust lawsuit filed against Intel Corp. after the U.S. Supreme Court decided to uphold a statute that allows a U.S. judge to order Intel to turn over documents from a private antitrust suit to a European Communities investigation. ...

  • Intel in hot water over lost e-mails. Preimersberger, Chris // eWeek;3/12/2007, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p18 

    The article reports on the updates concerning the two-year old case of Intel Corp. against rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) in the U.S. AMD alleged that Intel engaged in anti-competitive practices to maintain monopolistic position in the market due to the failure of its internal...

  • AMD Strengthens Arsenal for Attack on Intel.  // Electronic News;7/11/2005, Vol. 51 Issue 28, pN.PAG 

    Reports on the motion won by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), to served document preservation subpoenas against third parties as part of the antitrust suit it filed against Intel Corp., in July 2005. Way by which Intel has maintained its monopoly in the x86 microprocessor market; Permission...

  • We Have a Right to Know. Yager, Tom // InfoWorld;2/6/2006, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p24 

    The article discusses the importance of the right of the public to know and the freedom of the press in the case of AMD v. Intel filed in Japan for the violation of anti-monopoly statutes by Intel. The Fair Trade Commission of Japan (JFTC) found that Intel pressured system makers into limiting...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics