TITLE

Authors' Reply

AUTHOR(S)
Rajaduraipandi, K.
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology;Oct2006, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p305
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
23608374

 

Related Articles

  • Hydrogen rules? Dickson, Edward M. // Industrial Physicist;Jun/Jul2004, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p5 

    Replies to comments on the author's article about hydrogen storage.

  • The author replies. Day Jr., Samuel H. // Progressive;Dec87, Vol. 51 Issue 12, p6 

    Replies to comments on the author's article on nuclear disarmament.

  • Response by the authors. Uppal, Monica; Srinivas, C. R. // Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprology;May/Jun2005, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p212 

    Presents a reply by the author to a letter to the editor about urticaria.

  • Radiographic Abnormalities: Response from Peipins et al. Peipins, Lucy A.; Lewin, Michael; Campolucci, Sharon; Lybarger, Jeffrey A.; Kapil, Vikas; Middleton, Dan; Miller, Aubrey; Weis, Christopher; Spence, Michael; Black, Brad // Environmental Health Perspectives;Feb2004, Vol. 112 Issue 2, pA83 

    Replies to comments on the author's article on asbestos exposure.

  • Evolutionists Are Politically Left of Center.  // Skeptic;2004, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p23 

    Replies to a letter to the editor about the authors' article on evolutionists.

  • The awkward squaddie. Croft, Andy // New Statesman & Society;3/18/94, Vol. 7 Issue 294, p57 

    Explains why George Orwell's reply was not published in the `Left Review' pamphlet `Authors Take Side on the Spanish War,' by Nancy Cunard. Excerpts from Orwell's reply; Authors who replied to Cunard's questionnaire.

  • The awkward squaddie. Croft, Andy // New Statesman & Society;3/11/94, Vol. 7 Issue 293, p57 

    Explains why George Orwell's reply was not in the `Left Review' pamphlet `Authors Take Side on the Spanish War,' by Nancy Cunard. Excerpts from Orwell's reply; Authors who replied to Cunard's questionnaire.

  • Mike Sharpe replies. Sharpe, Mike // Challenge (05775132);Mar/Apr2009, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p123 

    The author replies to criticism of his economic analysis by the economist Mark Skousen.

  • In Reply: Inconsistent Terminology. Marburg, Rolf Maier; Dudenhausen, Joachim W. // Deutsches Aerzteblatt International;12/17/2010, Vol. 107 Issue 50, p902 

    The article presents a reply by the authors to a response on their article on multiple pregnancies.

  • Television Commercial Test Scores and Short-Term Changes in Market Shares. Buzzell, Robert D.; Kolin, Marshall; Murphy, Malcolm P. // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);Aug1965, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p307 

    In this rejoinder, the authors reply to the criticism of the Schwerin Analyses made by Messrs. Fothergill and Ehrenberg.

Share

Other Topics