How Important are Insurers in Compensating Claims for Personal Injury in the U.K.?*

Richard RL Lewis
April 2006
Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance - Issues & Practice;Apr2006, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p323
Academic Journal
To what extent does the institution of insurance influence a system of compensation for personal injury? On the one hand, some academics have suggested that insurance has been no more than a “makeweight” argument in the development of tort liability. On the other hand, others have claimed that insurance has had a substantial effect, even if this is often hidden or not discussed openly. This article lends support to one side of the debate by describing the enormous importance of insurers to personal injury litigation in the United Kingdom. It argues that all cases, in their wider context, have been affected by the practices of insurance companies. This is the case even though insurance is rarely mentioned by judges and largely ignored by textbooks on tort law. Insurers provide the lifeblood of the system. The article examines statistics relating to the number of tort claims brought each year and it notes the extent of insurer involvement. As the paymasters of the system, insurers not only compensate claimants but also fund the cost of legal representation, often for both sides. Insurers have reduced their use of defence lawyers and the extent that they institute formal legal proceedings. However, it is their bureaucracy which determines whether, when and for how much claims are settled, and it is their offices, rather than courts of law, that are the key places for tort in practice. The scope for compensating those injured very much depends upon the incidence of insurance protection, and the amount of damages paid can only be understood against the insurance background. Finally, the article considers the influence of insurers upon potential changes in the law. The importance of insurers ought not to be underestimated; without insurance, the system of compensation for personal injury would have collapsed long ago. The Geneva Papers (2006) 31, 323–339. Doi:10. 1057/palgrave. Gpp. 2510073


Related Articles

  • EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY IN GREAT BRITAIN. FRANK, W. F. // Law & Contemporary Problems;Summer1953, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p320 

    The article discusses the issue of employers' liability in the U.S. The law of employers' liability is concerned with the liability of an employer to pay damages to his servants for injuries which they have sustained in the course of their work. The common law liability of an employer for...

  • A DECADE OF PROGRESS UNDER THE FEDERAL EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT. DEPARCQ, WILLIAM H. // Law & Contemporary Problems;Summer1953, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p257 

    The article offers information on the progress made under the federal employers liability act in the U.S. Employers liability have been discussed in the railroad industry mainly in terms of accidents. It is expected to find perfect justice in fixing liability and in assessing damages for the...

  • Corporate and Industrial Hazing: Barbarism and the Law. Lewis, Darryll M. Halcomb // Labor Law Journal;Feb92, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p71 

    This article discusses the civil liabilities of employers and employees to individuals exposed to and injured by the cruelties of corporate and industrial employment hazing in the U.S. Corporate and industrial hazing is the practice or custom of intentional physical or mental abuse to newly...

  • Stressing the point The employer. Zindani, Jeff // Lawyer;6/21/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 24, p25 

    Discusses the views of an employer on the debate on personal injuries claims for occupation stress. Claim of the court that the employer is entitled to assume that the employee can withstand the normal pressures of the job; Offer of clear guidance by the court on the apportionment of...

  • Notes and Recent Decisions. Mellor, Michael L.; Saveri, Richard; White, Byron F.; Anderson IV, James P. // California Law Review;Aug50, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p515 

    Presents an update on legal issues and court decisions in the U.S. as of August 1950. Trends and proposals in fair employment practices; Releases and agreements limiting liability under the federal employers' liability act; Recovery of engagement gifts.

  • Cause and effect. Sanderson, Tim // Money Management;12/2/2010, Vol. 24 Issue 45, p26 

    The article offers information on the advantages and disadvantages of Centrelink compensation rules in Australia. The author mentions that these payments are beneficial to clients because they receive payments, either whole or partial, due to personal injury. He adds that their compensation...

  • Publication Demystifies Workers' Comp Law.  // Claims;Jun2008, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p66 

    The article reports on the publication by the law firm Fried, Kane, Walters, Zuschlag and Grochmal of the "2008 Employers' Guide to Pennsylvania's Workers' Compensation Law" designed to aid Pennsylvania employers in handling their employees' compensation insurance. The publication introduces the...

  • Update on the Latest Programs and Events in Your Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section.  // Brief;Winter2007, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p10 

    The article reports on current efforts by the American Bar Association's Tort Trial & Insurance Section regarding terrorism risk insurance and the creation of a National College of Workers' Compensation Lawyers. About 50 lawyers will be inducted into the college in March. The article describes...

  • Employer's Liability Explained. Gagen, Neal // Risk Management (00355593);Feb2006, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p44 

    This article explains how employers liability coverage responds to those instances in which workers compensation does not apply and the standard limits, coverage conditions and exclusions of employers liability coverage. Even if workers compensation coverage is compulsory and the categories of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics