TITLE

High court justices debate their views on Constitution

AUTHOR(S)
Sherman, Mark
PUB. DATE
December 2006
SOURCE
Buffalo Law Journal;12/11/2006, Vol. 78 Issue 99, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that Stephen Breyer and Antonin Scalia, U.S. Supreme Court justices, debated regarding their different views on the Constitution. The justices tackled issues including abortion, religion and death penalty. Both justices also question lawyers regarding the use of race to promote diversity in the classroom.
ACCESSION #
23565235

 

Related Articles

  • An exercise in futility. Lowry, Brian // Daily Variety;4/29/2009, Vol. 303 Issue 17, p1 

    The article reports on the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) right to patrol the airwaves in the U.S. Under Justice Antonin Scalia, the court cease to consider a lower court's ruling on the use of fleeting expletives which was exacerbated by...

  • The Quotable Court.  // Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases;4/21/2014, Vol. 41 Issue 7, p289 

    The article presents some of the comments by justices and the advocates during the hearing of the case, Wood v. Moss, before the U.S. Supreme Court, with the Court asked to consider varied First Amendment, qualified immunity and civil procedure concerns in relation to actions of secret service...

  • TO UNDERSTAND FOREIGN COURT CITATION: DISSECTING ORIGINALISM, DYNAMISM, ROMANTICISM, AND CONSEQUENTIALISM. Ghoshray, Saby // Albany Law Review;2006, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p709 

    The article examines the foreign law jurisprudence of individual Supreme Court justices in the U.S. The difference of the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer is cited. The concept of living dynamic constitution plays a role in the jurisprudence of Ruth...

  • SELL v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Sell v. United States, case number 02-5664, argued on March 3, 2003 and decided on June 16, 2003. The case focuses on the authorization given by the Magistrate to force the administration of antipsychotic drugs to Charles Thomas Sell,...

  • The Supreme Court's Summary Docket: Highlights, Trends, and Statistics. Watson, Ryan J. // Appellate Practice Journal;Summer2016, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p2 

    The article discusses recent trends and statistics in the summary docket, an official summary of proceedings in a court of law, of the U.S. Supreme Court relating to summary judgments. Topics include summary reversals issued by the court in 2015 with a reference to death of justice Antonin...

  • The ball's in their court. Zeller, Gregory // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);10/5/2007, Vol. 54 Issue 47, p1A 

    The article presents the nine justices for the 2007 term of the U.S. Supreme Court. They include chief justice John G. Roberts Jr., associate justices John Paul Stevens and Antonin Scalia. The new justices are debating on everything from federal sentencing guidelines to Guantanamo detainees to...

  • SATTAZAHN v. PENNSYLVANIA: certiorari to the supreme court of pennsylvania.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, case number 01-7574, argued on November 4, 2002 and decided on January 14, 2003. The case considers the applicability of the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause in the context of capital-sentencing...

  • Why the court needs a liberal. Kaplan, David A. // Newsweek;4/18/1994, Vol. 123 Issue 16, p25 

    Asserts that the US Supreme Court has no ideological breadth and that President Bill Clinton should pick an unabashed liberal to fill Justice Harry Blackmun's vacancy because it would enhance the court's prestige for the long term. Loss of liberals Thurgood Marshall in 1991 and William Brennan...

  • STOGNER v. CALIFORNIA: certiorari to the court of appeal of california, first appellate circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Stogner v. California, case number 01-1757, argued on March 31, 2003 and decided on June 26, 2003. The case focuses on a criminal prosecution brought by the state of California against Marion Reynolds Stogner which allegedly violated...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics