TITLE

Regulatory Takings: The Supreme Court Tries to Prune Agins Without Stepping on Nollan and Dolan

AUTHOR(S)
Pollak, Daniel
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p925
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article discusses the U. S. Supreme Court ruling on regulatory takings in Lingle v. Chevron. The case involved a challenge to a Hawaii statute that capped the rent that oil companies could charge to gasoline retailers who rent company-owned service stations. In an opinion written by Justice O'Connor, the Court declares that the "substantially advances test is not a valid takings test" and "has no proper place in our takings jurisprudence. " The case originated with Hawaii's effort to control high gasoline prices.
ACCESSION #
23498067

 

Related Articles

  • Eminent domain facing lega challenges. Lieber, Tammy // Indianapolis Business Journal;2/21/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 51, p19 

    Focuses on the controversy over what constitutes "public use" in eminent domain. Utilization in redevelopment projects; Question being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Indiana General Assembly; Case involving the condemnation of a blighted area in New London, Connecticut.

  • How She Beat City Hall. D'Agostino, Ryan // Money;Sep2006, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p28 

    The article focuses on Susette Kelo, of New London, Connecticut. Kelo will relocate her 1893 home in a deal with the town of New London. Kelo lost a U.S. Supreme Court case in 2005 against the town, which wanted to seize her home by eminent domain. The article discusses the grassroots...

  • NOT FOR SALE. Langdon, Philip // Planning;Apr2005, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p12 

    This article reports on facts related to a 90-acre patch of land in New London, Connecticut. For more than four years, a 90-acre patch of land in New London, Connecticut has occupied center stage in the city's--and the nations--most momentous battle over eminent domain. The decision in Kelo v....

  • Eminent domain issue fuels response from Valley officials. Yamada, Stefanie Hard // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;12/23/2005, Issue 323495, p1 

    The article reports on key controversies pertaining to the United States Supreme Court ruling on eminent domain citing its effects on the operations of local redevelopment agencies. Apparently, the eminent domain policy are used on private property owners citing the Supreme Court ruling in favor...

  • THE USELESSNESS OF PUBLIC USE. Bell, Abraham; Parchomovsky, Gideon // Columbia Law Review;Oct2006, Vol. 106 Issue 6, p1412 

    The Supreme Court decision of Kelo v. City of New London has been denounced by legal scholars from the entire political spectrum and given rise to numerous legislative proposals to reverse Kelo's deferential interpretation of the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and instead, limit the...

  • Land Use Implications of Casinos and Racinos on Local Governments in New York State. McClenathan, Edward W. // Urban Lawyer;Winter2007, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p111 

    The article examines the implications of casinos and racinos on land use control by local governments in the New York. It defines the types of existing casinos in the state and how they are created. It also discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court case and subsequent federal district court cases may...

  • What's Growing On in COURT RULINGS. Sinopoli, Joseph // American Nurseryman;8/1/2005, Vol. 202 Issue 3, p15 

    Focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court that the city of New London, Connecticut, was justified in its eminent domain claims against the American Nursery and Landscape Association (ANLA) who refused to sell to developers. Comment of John Meredith, director of legislative relations of...

  • Eminent Domain May Hit Home for One Justice. Hemphill, Allen Polk // San Diego Business Journal;7/11/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 28, p42 

    Comments on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court over the case "Kelo vs. the city of New London, Connecticut" in relevance to the interpretation of the Constitution concerning eminent domain. Potential negative impact of the ruling to citizens; Influence of the ruling to benefit citizens by...

  • Feds unlikely to impose new eminent domain limits. Hoover, Kent // Buffalo Law Journal;12/11/2006, Vol. 78 Issue 99, p11 

    The article reports that the ballot initiatives which protect property rights against government use of eminent domain powers were approved by voters in nine states. Eminent domain is the power of the government to acquire private property and take a title for public use. The U.S. Supreme Court...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics