TITLE

New York v. EPA: State Response to a Federal Regulatory Rollback

AUTHOR(S)
Roberts, Casey
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p613
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In New York v. Environmental Protection Agency, the D.C. Circuit upheld most of EPA's changes to the Clean Air Act's New Source Review program. Despite widespread public criticism that the new rule would make it easier for existing sources to avoid installing pollution control technology when they make modifications, the D.C. Circuit deterred to EPA's judgment that the new rule would have compensating environmental benefits. However the court did vacate the rule's Clean Units and Pollution Control Projects provisions, and remanded to the agency to provide a more reasoned explanation of how less stringent reporting requirements would not undermine EPA enforcement practices. The court also deferred two potentially critical questions as unripe: whether EPA can compel states to adopt the new rules and whether EPA's approval of state implementation plans containing the new rules would violate the Clean Air Act's anti-backsliding provisions. After examining the court's entire decision, this Note will focus on these two deferrals and argue that they were prudent given the very detailed factual records necessary to decide these claims. By leaving these claims unsettled, the decision allows for further analysis of the new rule's environmental and health effects-analysis that might improve the rule's clarity, practicability, and environmental sustainability.
ACCESSION #
23498057

 

Related Articles

  • The U.S. Supreme Court's New Dukedom: The Hour and Year, or a Proposal Quite Near. Potts, Brian H. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p517 

    The federal government in late 1999 sued thirty-six electric power facilities to enforce several of the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR) and New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) provisions. As these cases have slowly churned through the courts, the government has simultaneously tinkered...

  • Delegation of Authority to the Commonwealth of Virginia To Implement and Enforce Additional or Revised National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards. Esher, Diana // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;5/16/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 95, p28875 

    The article offers information on the delegation of authority notice issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It states that EPA has sent letter to the Commonwealth of Virginia informing Virginia's delegation authority to implement the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;3/12/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 48, p14033 

    The article announces notices issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA announces its widely applicable alternative test method approval decisions in support of New Source Performance Standards, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and the...

  • Epa's Revised New Source Review Regulations Take Effect. Mastroyannis-Zaft, David // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p805 

    Provides an overview of the revisions made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the Clean Air Act's New Source Review regulations. Provisions on emissions and pollution control; Modifications made to the regulations; Changes made on how emission resulting from physical or operational...

  • Clean air act update. Bassett, Susan // Pollution Engineering;Sep99, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p21 

    Presents an update on the Clean Air Act of 1990 in the United States (US). US Environmental Protection Agency's publication of a final rule requiring all 50 states to analyze their contributions to regional haze; Challenge of measuring natural visibility conditions for the mandatory Class I...

  • High Court Upholds CAA Standards. Krukowski, John // Pollution Engineering;Apr2001, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p9 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court ruled in February 2001 upholding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) implementation of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Points of disagreement of the court with industry groups on their charges against EPA; Supreme Court's validation of the ability...

  • Keeping Grandfathered Polluters Alive: EPA's New Equipment Replacement Provision. Moses, Shane J. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2004, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p787 

    Focuses on the final rule, Equipment Replacement Provision released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on August 27, 2003. Impact of the provision on the implementation of the Clean Air Act in the country; Criticisms against the shortcomings of the rule; Threats posed by the provision...

  • Aggregation proclamation. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;1/19/2009, Vol. 14 Issue 19, p5 

    The article reports that the The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has finalized a change to the Clean Air Act's New Source Review that could make it easier to modify or modernize industrial facilities. It is stated that the NSR is a program that requires power plants and industrial...

  • The Environmental Propaganda Agency. Marxsen, Craig S. // Independent Review;Summer2000, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p65 

    Focuses on allegations on the costs and benefits of the Clean Air Act and its amendments by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Exaggeration on the total costs and benefits of the act from 1970 to 1990 by the EPA; Details of researches conducted by independent groups on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics