TITLE

New York v. EPA: State Response to a Federal Regulatory Rollback

AUTHOR(S)
Roberts, Casey
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p613
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In New York v. Environmental Protection Agency, the D.C. Circuit upheld most of EPA's changes to the Clean Air Act's New Source Review program. Despite widespread public criticism that the new rule would make it easier for existing sources to avoid installing pollution control technology when they make modifications, the D.C. Circuit deterred to EPA's judgment that the new rule would have compensating environmental benefits. However the court did vacate the rule's Clean Units and Pollution Control Projects provisions, and remanded to the agency to provide a more reasoned explanation of how less stringent reporting requirements would not undermine EPA enforcement practices. The court also deferred two potentially critical questions as unripe: whether EPA can compel states to adopt the new rules and whether EPA's approval of state implementation plans containing the new rules would violate the Clean Air Act's anti-backsliding provisions. After examining the court's entire decision, this Note will focus on these two deferrals and argue that they were prudent given the very detailed factual records necessary to decide these claims. By leaving these claims unsettled, the decision allows for further analysis of the new rule's environmental and health effects-analysis that might improve the rule's clarity, practicability, and environmental sustainability.
ACCESSION #
23498057

 

Related Articles

  • The U.S. Supreme Court's New Dukedom: The Hour and Year, or a Proposal Quite Near. Potts, Brian H. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p517 

    The federal government in late 1999 sued thirty-six electric power facilities to enforce several of the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR) and New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) provisions. As these cases have slowly churned through the courts, the government has simultaneously tinkered...

  • Delegation of Authority to the Commonwealth of Virginia To Implement and Enforce Additional or Revised National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards. Esher, Diana // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;5/16/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 95, p28875 

    The article offers information on the delegation of authority notice issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It states that EPA has sent letter to the Commonwealth of Virginia informing Virginia's delegation authority to implement the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;3/12/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 48, p14033 

    The article announces notices issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA announces its widely applicable alternative test method approval decisions in support of New Source Performance Standards, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and the...

  • Epa's Revised New Source Review Regulations Take Effect. Mastroyannis-Zaft, David // Ecology Law Quarterly;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p805 

    Provides an overview of the revisions made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the Clean Air Act's New Source Review regulations. Provisions on emissions and pollution control; Modifications made to the regulations; Changes made on how emission resulting from physical or operational...

  • EPA's air program: Still hazy after all these years. Neville, Angela // Power;Sep2008, Vol. 152 Issue 9, p70 

    The article discusses the controversy on air pollution provisions in the U.S. The decision of the federal court on the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) resulted to dissatisfaction. Stephen Johnson, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), commented on the decisions of the...

  • Clean Air Interstate Rule in place. Light, Russ; Krause, Tim // Electric Light & Power;Jul/Aug2005, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p22 

    Reports on the initiative of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in publishing final regulation known as the Clean Air Insterstate Rule. Option to require that power plants participate in EP-administered emission trading programs; Compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards...

  • Rules on fracking to be released. Geman, Ben // Hill;4/16/2012, Vol. 19 Issue 44, p13 

    The article reports on the completion of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to a rule which will address air pollution fro offshore oil and gas development.

  • Pollution Bureaucracy Emits Bad Odor.  // Grand Rapids Business Journal;7/14/2003, Vol. 21 Issue 28, p4 

    Comments on the plan of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to implement new air pollution regulations in West Michigan in 2003. List of counties to be declared as out of compliance; Potential impact of the planned regulations on the business community.

  • Clean air act update. Bassett, Susan // Pollution Engineering;Sep99, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p21 

    Presents an update on the Clean Air Act of 1990 in the United States (US). US Environmental Protection Agency's publication of a final rule requiring all 50 states to analyze their contributions to regional haze; Challenge of measuring natural visibility conditions for the mandatory Class I...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics