TITLE

Kelo v. City of New London: The More Things Stay the Same, the More They Change

AUTHOR(S)
Calfee, Corinne
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p545
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Kelo v. City of New London, the Supreme Court upheld the traditionally broad definition of "public use" and the use of judicial deference to legislative decisions to exercise the power of eminent domain. This holding was appropriate: governments at all levels need the flexibility to exercise the power of eminent domain in the face of changing, social needs, without the judiciary second-guessing each decision. Political and fiscal limitations already constrain the exercise of eminent domain. At the same time, the Kelo decision may have opened the door to future changes in the level of judicial scrutiny applied in eminent domain decisions by implying that comprehensive planning could help justify a project. The immediate aftermath suggests that the Kelo decision may catalyze a dramatic change in property rights as state legislatures have acted quickly and decisively to limit the definition of public use. Thus the petitioners in Kelo may have lost the battle, but they seem to be winning the war as laws around the county change in the direction they sought.
ACCESSION #
23498055

 

Related Articles

  • THE USELESSNESS OF PUBLIC USE. Bell, Abraham; Parchomovsky, Gideon // Columbia Law Review;Oct2006, Vol. 106 Issue 6, p1412 

    The Supreme Court decision of Kelo v. City of New London has been denounced by legal scholars from the entire political spectrum and given rise to numerous legislative proposals to reverse Kelo's deferential interpretation of the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and instead, limit the...

  • Feds unlikely to impose new eminent domain limits. Hoover, Kent // Buffalo Law Journal;12/11/2006, Vol. 78 Issue 99, p11 

    The article reports that the ballot initiatives which protect property rights against government use of eminent domain powers were approved by voters in nine states. Eminent domain is the power of the government to acquire private property and take a title for public use. The U.S. Supreme Court...

  • A HOMEOWNER'S BATTLE. Barnett, Megan // U.S. News & World Report;2/28/2005, Vol. 138 Issue 7, p48 

    Focuses on Susette Kelo's battle against the city of New London, Connecticut, which is trying to seize Kelo's home for a development project. Efforts of the city to remove Kelo from her home; Observation that in several states economically distressed municipalities are looking to high-end...

  • NOT FOR SALE. Langdon, Philip // Planning;Apr2005, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p12 

    This article reports on facts related to a 90-acre patch of land in New London, Connecticut. For more than four years, a 90-acre patch of land in New London, Connecticut has occupied center stage in the city's--and the nations--most momentous battle over eminent domain. The decision in Kelo v....

  • Recent Developments in Eminent Domain: Public Use. THOMAS, ROBERT H. // Urban Lawyer;Summer2012, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p705 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London, which dealt with eminent domain in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Public Use Clause, the authority of the government to take private property, and the common carrier doctrine. Information is provided on the...

  • Future of eminent domain after Kelo v. City of New London. Johndroe III, S. G.; McCabe, Brian // Fort Worth Business Press;7/11/2005, Vol. 18 Issue 28, p23 

    Focuses on the significance of the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Kelo versus City of New London, Connecticut which affirms that local officials should decide on the use of eminent domain authority for economic development and are authorized to determine whether using that power...

  • Palazzio v. Rhode Island: Ripeness and 'Notice' Rule Clarified and Statutory 'Background Principles' Narrowed. Callies, David L.; Chipchase, Calvert G. // Urban Lawyer;Fall2001, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p907 

    Analyzes the Palazzio versus Rhode Island U.S. Supreme Court case on the law of property takings. Facts on the case; Claims of the plaintiff against the state of Rhode Island; Outcome of the case.

  • Land Use Implications of Casinos and Racinos on Local Governments in New York State. McClenathan, Edward W. // Urban Lawyer;Winter2007, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p111 

    The article examines the implications of casinos and racinos on land use control by local governments in the New York. It defines the types of existing casinos in the state and how they are created. It also discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court case and subsequent federal district court cases may...

  • Legislative panels craft new eminent domain guidelines.  // New Hampshire Business Review;10/14/2005, Vol. 27 Issue 22, p43 

    Reports on legislative panels' joint meeting to discuss their response to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on eminent domain. Court's permission for the city of New London, Connecticut to takeover a group of older waterfront homes for private development; Critics' launch of a campaign to seize...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics