TITLE

Exceptions to the Rule: Curing the Law's Failure to Protect Intersex Infants

AUTHOR(S)
Tamar-Mattis, Anne
PUB. DATE
May 2006
SOURCE
Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice;2006, Vol. 21, p59
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article proposes that court involvement could improve the decision-making process about genital-normalizing surgery on intersex infants using the categorical exception model. It offers background information on intersex treatment, including the theory behind genital-normalizing surgery, critiques of the surgical model, and options for nonsurgical treatment of intersex children. It also outlines the parent-doctor decision-making presumption.
ACCESSION #
23201564

 

Related Articles

  • DEFINING, ASSIGNING AND DESIGNING SEX. Chau, P.-L.; Herring, Jonathan // International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family;Dec2002, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p327 

    This article challenges the distinction the law draws between male and female. It focuses on the legal and medical treatment of intersexual people. Analysing the nature and rate of intersexuality it argues that there is a significant number of people who cannot be described as either male or...

  • Docs agree on how to treat intersex patients.  // Contemporary Sexuality;Nov2006, Vol. 40 Issue 11, p12 

    The article reports on the way physicians treat children born with ambiguous genitalia as advocated by Cheryl Chase, the founder of the Intersex Society of North America. Chase advocates parents to choose a gender for their intersex children but hold off on surgery until the child is old enough...

  • BEYOND THE LOCKER ROOM: CHANGING NARRATIVES ON EARLY SURGERY FOR INTERSEX CHILDREN. Davidian, Alison // Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society;Spring2011, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p1 

    The article explores the debate on early surgery to normalize the appearance of genitals for intersex children particularly in the U.S. The dominant treatment model by Doctor John Money and the risks involved with genital normalizing surgery are tackled. The move by intersex activists to compare...

  • Post-Cuno Limitations on State Taxpayer Standing. Cole, Douglas R. // Corporate Business Taxation Monthly;Nov2007, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p11 

    The article focuses on the legal case of Daimler Chrysler v. Cuno regarding the state taxation in the U.S. The Supreme Court has decided that the plaintiffs cannot rely on their status as state taxpayers in challenging the expenditures of state funds illegally. The effects of the decision of the...

  • Foreign Affairs Litigation in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Analysis. Randazzo, Kirk A. // Justice System Journal;2004, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p227 

    Analyzes foreign affairs litigation in the United States Courts of Appeals. Understanding of how the judiciary operates in the foreign relations scheme; Influence of competing preferences on decision making; Paradoxical dilemma facing judges in foreign policy cases; Theoretical expectations for...

  • PROBING THE FRONTIERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. Johnston, Peter; Young, Simon; Hooker, Richard; Pontre, Tom // AIAL Forum;Nov2011, Issue 67, p1 

    The article offers information on the emerging trends of judicial decision making and judicial review approaches in Australia. It presents the importance of emerging judicial themes in the establishment of public litigation laws in the country. Moreover, it presents different court cases that...

  • Case of the week: Civil Procedure.  // Lawyer (Online Edition);7/16/2012, p8 

    The article discusses the court case between VTB Capital PLC with several other firms including Nutritek International Corp, Marshall Capital Holdings Ltd and Marshall Capital LLC which deals with the misuse of corporate structure. It states that VTB Capital has refused to accept the decision of...

  • Motor dealer's neglect. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Aug1978, Vol. 89 Issue 1020, p31 

    Focuses on the back-duty investigation of Johnson versus Scott filed at Great Britain Court of Appeals. Details of the complaints; Scrutiny on the duty of Commissioner Scott in disclosing annual outgoings of Johnson; Decision of the General Commissioners and Justice Walton on the case.

  • Abortion in Canada. Dunlop, Marilyn // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);8/19/89, Vol. 299 Issue 6697, p474 

    Focuses on the abortion case involving Chantal Daigle filed in Quebec Court of Appeal in Canada. Decision of the Canadian Supreme Court on the injunction issued by the Court of Appeal; Stance of the Canadian Medical Association on the issue; Details of the case.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics